Literature DB >> 15889656

Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.

Marco Cune1, Frits van Kampen, Andries van der Bilt, Frits Bosman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to: (1) determine patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures using magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket attachments; and (2) assess the relation between maximum bite force and patient satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-over clinical trial, 18 edentulous patients with mandibular denture complaints received two mandibular implants and new mandibular and maxillary dentures. The mandibular denture was initially without any kind of attachment system, but it was fitted with one of the attachment types after 3 months. The attachments were changed 3 months thereafter, in random order. A questionnaire on denture complaints was administered at baseline (with the old denture), after 3 months of function with the new denture without attachments, and after 3 months of function with each of the attachments (within-subject comparison). In addition, patients were asked to express their overall appreciation of their dentures on a VAS. Patients' preferences were determined at the end of the experiment. Maximum bite forces were obtained from a previous study with the same population. Five scales of denture complaints were constructed. Mean scale and VAS scores at the five evaluation points were compared among the groups. Pearson correlation was calculated between maximum bite force and scale and VAS scores. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Mandibular implant-supported overdenture treatment reduced various denture complaints. The VAS score better reflected patients' preferences than did scale score. Patients strongly preferred bar-clip (10/18 subjects) and ball-socket attachments (7/18 subjects) over magnet attachments (1/18 subjects). Patients' preferences could not be predicted on the basis of baseline observations. Maximum bite force was not correlated to scale or VAS score. Hence, patients with higher maximum bite forces were not necessarily more satisfied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15889656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  16 in total

1.  Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-02-06

2.  Two Years Retrospective Evaluation of Overdenture Retained by Symphyseal Single Implant Using Two Types of Attachments.

Authors:  Hussien Abdelfattah Ismail; Ahmed I Mahrous; Fahad H Banasr; Tarek A Soliman; Yasser Baraka
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro Rosa; Rafaella de Souza Leão; Cátia Maria Fonseca Guerra; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado; Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-03-14

Review 4.  Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Soumyadev Satpathy; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty; Bharat Raj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 6.  Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Keshk; Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi; Radhwan S Algabri; Mostafa S Swedan; Amal Kaddah
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  A comparative evaluation of fatigue resistance of two different implant overdenture stud attachments with two different denture base materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Namrata Agrawal; Sumeet Jain; Deepak Agrawal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws.

Authors:  Alan Gt Payne; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Momen A Atieh; Marco Esposito; Sunyoung Ma; Marwah Anas El-Wegoud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-11

9.  An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.

Authors:  Tejomaya Shastry; N M Anupama; Shilpa Shetty; M Nalinakshamma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Validation and comparison of the Arabic versions of GOHAI and OHIP-14 in patients with and without denture experience.

Authors:  Sarah M Osman; Nadia Khalifa; Mohammed Nasser Alhajj
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.