Literature DB >> 15888714

Biomechanical comparison of the bioabsorbable RetroScrew system, BioScrew XtraLok with stress equalization tensioner, and 35-mm Delta Screws for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation in porcine tibiae.

Haw Chong Chang1, John Nyland, Akbar Nawab, Robert Burden, David N M Caborn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Achieving effective soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation remains problematic. HYPOTHESIS: No differences would exist for tibialis anterior graft-tibial tunnel fixation when comparing the RetroScrew System (20-mm retrograde screw, 17-mm antegrade screw), the 35-mm tapered Delta Screw (manual tensioning), and the 35-mm BioScrew XtraLok (applied using an instrumented tensioner). STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Porcine tibiae (apparent bone mineral density, 1.3 g/cm(2)) and human tendon allografts were divided into 3 matched groups of 6 specimens each before cyclic (500 cycles, 50-250 N, 1 Hz) and load-to-failure (20 mm/min) tests.
RESULTS: The BioScrew XtraLok (210.9 +/- 54.9 N/mm) and the 35-mm Delta Screw (224.3 +/- 43.7 N/mm) displayed superior stiffness to the RetroScrew System (114.1 +/- 23.3 N/mm) (P = .0004) during cyclic testing. The BioScrew XtraLok (1.0 +/- 0.2 mm) and the Delta Screw (0.9 +/- 0.2 mm) also displayed less displacement during cyclic testing than the RetroScrew System (1.8 +/- 0.5 mm) (P = .001). During load-to-failure testing, the BioScrew XtraLok withstood greater loads (1436.3 +/- 331.3 N) (P = .001) and displayed greater stiffness (323.6 +/- 56.8 N/mm) (P = .002) than the 35-mm Delta Screw (load, 1042.2 +/- 214.4 N; stiffness, 257.2 +/- 22.2 N/mm) and the RetroScrew System (load, 778.7 +/- 177.5 N; stiffness, 204.4 +/- 52.9 N/mm).
CONCLUSION: The BioScrew XtraLok with instrumented tensioning displayed superior fixation to the RetroScrew System and the 35-mm Delta Screw applied with manual tensioning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The BioScrew XtraLok may provide superior soft tissue graft-tibial tunnel fixation. Further in vitro studies using human tissue and in vivo clinical studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15888714     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504272265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

1.  Interference screws should be shorter than the hamstring tendon graft in the bone tunnel for best fixation.

Authors:  Michael Stalder; Mazda Farshad; Jess G Snedeker; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Recurrent locking of knee joint caused by intraarticular migration of bioabsorbable tibial interference screw after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Appelt; Martin Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparative biomechanical study of the Ligament Plate and other fixation devices in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Sang Hoon Yang; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A biomechanical comparison of shape memory compression staples and mechanical compression staples: compression or distraction?

Authors:  David Farr; Amer Karim; Michael Lutz; James Calder
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A biomechanical comparison of the Delta screw and RetroScrew tibial fixation on initial intra-articular graft tension.

Authors:  Peter C Rhee; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  María Prado; Belén Martín-Castilla; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; José Miguel Serrano-Fernández; Ana Pérez-Blanca; Francisco Ezquerro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A comparison of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Mark Bowen; Guillaume Odry; Michel Collette; Xavier Cassard; Hubert Lanternier; Thierry De Polignac
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Semitendinosus Tendon Using the PINN-ACL CrossPin System: Minimum 4-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Hee-Soo Kyung; Seung-Gil Baek; Byoung-Joo Lee; Chang-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-02

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a medial knee reconstruction with comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw constructs and optimization with a cortical button.

Authors:  Coen A Wijdicks; Emily J Brand; David J Nuckley; Steinar Johansen; Robert F LaPrade; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ha Sung Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Ah Reum Jo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.