Literature DB >> 15887044

Correlation of different bone markers with bone density in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy.

Konstanze Loddenkemper1, Nicole Bohl, Carsten Perka, Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester, Frank Buttgereit.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common concomitant disease in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Bone status is usually evaluated by determination of bone density in combination with clinical examinations and laboratory tests. However, the strength of individual biochemical bone makers in GC-induced osteoporosis has yet to be fully clarified. For this reason, different bone markers were investigated in correlation with bone density in patients with rheumatic diseases. Approximately 238 patients (212 women, 26 men) with a rheumatic disease and under GC therapy were examined consecutively for the first time with regard to bone density (BMD) and bone markers [osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (precipitation method/tandem-MP ostase), crosslinks [pyridinoline (PYD), deoxypyridinoline (DPX), N-terminal telopeptide (NTX)]]. The daily glucocorticoid dose was 10 mg prednisone equivalent (median), and the cumulative dose was 12 g prednisone equivalent (median). None of the patients had previously taken medication for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis was demonstrated in 35.3% of the patients, osteopenia in 47.5%, and a normal BMD in 17.2%. The results of tandem-MP ostase correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine and of the femoral neck. The values for N-terminal telopeptide and pyridinoline correlated only with the bone density of the femoral neck. All results were statistically significant, although the correlation coefficients were low. After classification of the patients according to their BMD values (osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal BMD), there were significantly more patients with bone markers above the norm in the osteoporosis group and in the osteopenia group than in the group with normal bone density. All bone markers recorded behaved similarly in relation to the bone density values. The same analysis was also undertaken for the different disease groups. In these subgroups there was also a correlation between ostase/crosslinks with BMD, but the correlation coefficients were low. A general recommendation for the routine use of a specific bone marker in patients with rheumatic diseases on glucocorticoid therapy cannot be made from a cost-benefit point of view mainly because of limited predictive power (low correlation coefficients, incomplete correlation with different sites of BMD measurement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15887044     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-005-0608-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  14 in total

1.  Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis?

Authors:  P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Molecular markers of bone turnover: biochemical, technical and analytical aspects.

Authors:  M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  E Dennison; R Eastell; C H Fall; S Kellingray; P J Wood; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  D Patschan; K Loddenkemper; F Buttgereit
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses.

Authors:  T P van Staa; H G Leufkens; L Abenhaim; B Zhang; C Cooper
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Serum type I collagen breakdown product (serum CTX) predicts hip fracture risk in elderly women: the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P Garnero; G Bréart; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Assessment of the serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase with a new immunoradiometric assay in patients with metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  B J Riis; M A Hansen; A M Jensen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Characterization of immunoreactive forms of human osteocalcin generated in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  P Garnero; M Grimaux; P Seguin; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Steroid induced osteoporosis: an opportunity for prevention?

Authors:  I D Peat; S Healy; D M Reid; S H Ralston
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Lipid paradox in rheumatoid arthritis: changes with rheumatoid arthritis therapies.

Authors:  Matxalen Amezaga Urruela; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  [Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].

Authors:  H Franck; J Braun; F Buttgereit; W Demary; G Hein; J Kekow; G Schett; P M Kern
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease: an update on treatment issues.

Authors:  Medha Barbhaiya; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Helmut Franck; Jurgen Gottwalt
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.980

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.