Literature DB >> 15886630

The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.

Ingo Todt1, Dietmar Basta, Andreas Eisenschenk, Arne Ernst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe the influence of electrode pull-back after cochlear implant insertion of Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrodes. STUDY
DESIGN: In a prospective intraoperative study, we analyzed the impedances, neural response telemetry responses, and the spread of excitation after cochlear implant electrode insertion and compared these data to those obtained after a subsequent, controlled pull-back of the electrode. Postoperative depth of electrode insertion was controlled by x-ray.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
SUBJECTS: Six patients (4 male, 2 female; 18 to 69 years) were implanted with a Nucleus 24 (RCA) cochlear implant with a perimodiolar electrode.
RESULTS: After a controlled pull-back, a significant decrease of the spread of excitation at the stimuli electrodes 5, 10, 15, and a nonsignificant decrease at stimuli electrode 20 compared to the recordings after the primary normal insertion procedure was found. The mean electric compound action potential amplitude was increased with an apical-to-basal tendency. Impedances remained unchanged by the pull-back. Mean insertion depth at the postoperative x-ray control was 372 degrees (+/- 10.2).
CONCLUSION: Controlled cochlear implant electrode pull-back is a novel technique that optimizes objective intraoperative electrophysiological recordings in patients implanted with a Nucleus 24 perimodiolar cochlear implant by a greater approximation of the electrode to the modiolus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15886630     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

1.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 2.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Rainer O Seidl; Arne Ernst
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-11

4.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Intracochlear Pressure Changes After Cochlea Implant Electrode Pullback-Reduction of Intracochlear Trauma.

Authors:  Gina Lauer; Julica Uçta; Lars Decker; Arneborg Ernst; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-11

6.  Advances to electrode pullback in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Dietmar Basta; Rainer Seidl; Arne Ernst
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-10-22

7.  Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Young Seok Kim; Hyung Dong Jo; Yoonjoong Kim; Marge Carandang; Gene Huh; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode.

Authors:  Sonja Ludwig; Niklas Riemann; Stefan Hans; Florian Christov; Johannes Maximilian Ludwig; Judith Saxe; Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Markus Pietsch; Daniel Schurzig; Rolf Salcher; Athanasia Warnecke; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.