Literature DB >> 15885699

The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta.

Jonathan P Vande Geest1, Michael S Sacks, David A Vorp.   

Abstract

The biomechanical response of normal and pathologic human abdominal aortic tissue to uniaxial loading conditions is insufficient for the characterization of its three-dimensional (3D) mechanical behavior. Planar biaxial mechanical evaluation allows for 3D constitutive modeling of nearly incompressible tissues, as well as the investigation of the nature of mechanical anisotropy. In the current study, 26 abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue samples and 8 age-matched (> 60 years of age) nonaneurysmal abdominal aortic (AA) tissue samples were obtained and tested using a tension-controlled biaxial testing protocol. Graphical response functions (Sun et al., 2003. J. Biomech. Eng. 125, 372-380) were used as a guide to describe the pseudo-elastic response of AA and AAA. Based on the observed pseudo-elastic response, a four-parameter exponential strain energy function developed by Vito (1990. J. Biomech. Eng. 112, 153-159) was used from which both an individual specimen and group material parameter sets were determined for both AA and AAA. Peak Green strain values in the circumferential (Ethetatheta,max) and longitudinal (ELL,max) directions under an equibiaxial tension of 120 N/m were also compared. The strain energy function fit all of the individual specimens well with an average R2 of 0.95 +/- 0.02 and 0.90 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SEM) for the AA and AAA groups, respectively. The average Ethetatheta,max at 200 N/m equibiaxial tension was found to be significantly smaller for AAAs as compared to AAs (0.07 +/- 0.01 versus 0.13 +/- 0.03, respectively; p < 0.01). There was also a pronounced increase in the circumferential stiffness for AAA tissue as compared to AA tissue, indicating a larger degree of anisotropy for this tissue as compared to age-matched AA tissue. We also observed that the four-parameter Fung-elastic model was not able to fit the AAA tissue mechanical response using physically realistic material parameter values. It was concluded that aneurysmal degeneration of the abdominal aorta is associated with an increase in mechanical anisotropy, with preferential stiffening in the circumferential direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15885699     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  63 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason N MacTaggart; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Yuris A Dzenis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Intracranial aneurysmal pulsatility as a new individual criterion for rupture risk evaluation: biomechanical and numeric approach (IRRAs Project).

Authors:  M Sanchez; O Ecker; D Ambard; F Jourdan; F Nicoud; S Mendez; J-P Lejeune; L Thines; H Dufour; H Brunel; P Machi; K Lobotesis; A Bonafe; V Costalat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Segmental aortic stiffening contributes to experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm development.

Authors:  Uwe Raaz; Alexander M Zöllner; Isabel N Schellinger; Ryuji Toh; Futoshi Nakagami; Moritz Brandt; Fabian C Emrich; Yosuke Kayama; Suzanne Eken; Matti Adam; Lars Maegdefessel; Thomas Hertel; Alicia Deng; Ann Jagger; Michael Buerke; Ronald L Dalman; Joshua M Spin; Ellen Kuhl; Philip S Tsao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Prior Distributions of Material Parameters for Bayesian Calibration of Growth and Remodeling Computational Model of Abdominal Aortic Wall.

Authors:  Sajjad Seyedsalehi; Liangliang Zhang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Cellular Microbiaxial Stretching to Measure a Single-Cell Strain Energy Density Function.

Authors:  Zaw Win; Justin M Buksa; Kerianne E Steucke; G W Gant Luxton; Victor H Barocas; Patrick W Alford
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Microstructure and mechanics of healthy and aneurysmatic abdominal aortas: experimental analysis and modelling.

Authors:  Justyna A Niestrawska; Christian Viertler; Peter Regitnig; Tina U Cohnert; Gerhard Sommer; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Potential biomechanical roles of risk factors in the evolution of thrombus-laden abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Lana Virag; John S Wilson; Jay D Humphrey; Igor Karšaj
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Biaxial response of ovine spinal cord dura mater.

Authors:  Snehal S Shetye; Matthew M Deault; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-02-14

Review 10.  Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment: A Consistent and Objective Decision-Making Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.