Literature DB >> 24852288

Intracranial aneurysmal pulsatility as a new individual criterion for rupture risk evaluation: biomechanical and numeric approach (IRRAs Project).

M Sanchez1, O Ecker2, D Ambard3, F Jourdan3, F Nicoud4, S Mendez4, J-P Lejeune5, L Thines5, H Dufour6, H Brunel7, P Machi2, K Lobotesis8, A Bonafe2, V Costalat2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The present study follows an experimental work based on the characterization of the biomechanical behavior of the aneurysmal wall and a numerical study where a significant difference in term of volume variation between ruptured and unruptured aneurysm was observed in a specific case. Our study was designed to highlight by means of numeric simulations the correlation between aneurysm sac pulsatility and the risk of rupture through the mechanical properties of the wall.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with previous work suggesting a correlation between the risk of rupture and the material properties of cerebral aneurysms, 12 fluid-structure interaction computations were performed on 12 "patient-specific" cases, corresponding to typical shapes and locations of cerebral aneurysms. The variations of the aneurysmal volume during the cardiac cycle (ΔV) are compared by using wall material characteristics of either degraded or nondegraded tissues.
RESULTS: Aneurysms were located on 6 different arteries: middle cerebral artery (4), anterior cerebral artery (3), internal carotid artery (1), vertebral artery (1), ophthalmic artery (1), and basilar artery (1). Aneurysms presented different shapes (uniform or multilobulated) and diastolic volumes (from 18 to 392 mm3). The pulsatility (ΔV/V) was significantly larger for a soft aneurysmal material (average of 26%) than for a stiff material (average of 4%). The difference between ΔV, for each condition, was statistically significant: P=.005.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference in aneurysmal pulsatility as highlighted in this work might be a relevant patient-specific predictor of aneurysm risk of rupture.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852288      PMCID: PMC7966262          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  27 in total

1.  Computation of hemodynamics in the circle of Willis.

Authors:  Martin Sandve Alnaes; Jørgen Isaksen; Kent-André Mardal; Bertil Romner; Michael K Morgan; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Monitoring the injured brain: ICP and CBF.

Authors:  L A Steiner; P J D Andrews
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.

Authors:  Peter Rissland; Yared Alemu; Shmuel Einav; John Ricotta; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Numerical model of bone remodeling sensitive to loading frequency through a poroelastic behavior and internal fluid movements.

Authors:  Etienne Malachanne; David Dureisseix; Franck Jourdan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 5.  The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; P M White
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  On the potentially protective role of contact constraints on saccular aneurysms.

Authors:  P Seshaiyer; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo A Castro; Sunil Appanaboyina; Christopher M Putman; Daniel Millan; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Hypertension, age, and location predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Brian V Nahed; Michael L DiLuna; Thomas Morgan; Eylem Ocal; Abigail A Hawkins; Koray Ozduman; Kristopher T Kahle; Andrea Chamberlain; Arun P Amar; Murat Gunel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  Daniel M Sforza; Christopher M Putman; Juan Raul Cebral
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 18.511

10.  In-vivo quantification of wall motion in cerebral aneurysms from 2D cine phase contrast magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  C Karmonik; O Diaz; R Grossman; R Klucznik
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-10-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Flow-splitting-based computation of outlet boundary conditions for improved cerebrovascular simulation in multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Sylvia Saalfeld; Samuel Voß; Oliver Beuing; Bernhard Preim; Philipp Berg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness.

Authors:  S Voß; S Glaßer; T Hoffmann; O Beuing; S Weigand; K Jachau; B Preim; D Thévenin; G Janiga; P Berg
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Hemodynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm characterized by in vitro 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Omid Amili; Daniele Schiavazzi; Sean Moen; Bharathi Jagadeesan; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Filippo Coletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.