Literature DB >> 15885331

Perceived qualitative benefits of cochlear implants in children with multi-handicaps.

Susan Wiley1, Margaret Jahnke, Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Daniel Choo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine families' perceived benefits of cochlear implants in children with multiple-handicaps.
METHODS: Parents/guardians of a child with a cochlear implant for at least 3 months, under the age of 18 years and had least one additional disability were recruited for participation through rehabilitation therapists. Families who did not have a child enrolled in therapy at the study center were contacted by mail. Families were asked a number of open-ended and close-ended questions. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, with answers to open-ended questions coded by themes.
RESULTS: We interviewed 19 families of 20 children and included 15 families of 16 children who had had at least 6 months of cochlear implant experience for this study. The mean time between implantation and study was 3 years (S.D.+/-2.2) with a range of 0.5-8 years. Children were highly compliant in wearing their device. Sixty-eight percent (11/16) of the children were enrolled in additional therapies beyond speech and aural rehabilitation therapies. Fifty percent of families (8/16) indicated they had no obstacles to accessing therapies. Insurance was the most common barrier to accessing therapies (18% of respondents). All children made communication progress post-implant as described by their families. All families felt that the cochlear implant team provided enough information prior to receiving the implant to help families make the appropriate decision about implanting their child. All families said that if they were to make the decision again, they would choose to have their child implanted.
CONCLUSION: More children with multiple-handicaps are receiving cochlear implants. Very young children may undergo cochlear implantation only to be subsequently diagnosed with an additional impairment or disability at later ages. As a result, it is important to understand the specific needs of this population and the parental perceptions of benefit in order to provide the best services and opportunities for success with a cochlear implant. Although not all of the children gained gold standard speech and language outcomes, all children broadened their communication skills. In motivated families of children with additional disabilities, it is appropriate to provide them with the same opportunity to access audition and expand their communication abilities as any other child with a hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15885331     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  16 in total

1.  Auditory skills, language development, and adaptive behavior of children with cochlear implants and additional disabilities.

Authors:  Jessica Beer; Michael S Harris; William G Kronenberger; Rachael Frush Holt; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  The outcome of cochlear implantation among children with genetic syndromes.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani; Rayan Alhussini; Rawan Hudeib; Tuqa Alkaff; Tahera Islam; Abdulrahman Alsanosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Profiles of Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities and Known Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Karen Erickson; Nancy Quick
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-09-06

4.  Cognitive outcomes and familial stress after cochlear implantation in deaf children with and without developmental delays.

Authors:  John S Oghalai; Susan E Caudle; Barbara Bentley; Homer Abaya; Jerry Lin; Dian Baker; Claudia Emery; Heather Bortfeld; Jody Winzelberg
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Cochlear implant considerations in children with additional disabilities.

Authors:  C Eduardo Corrales; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

6.  The P1 biomarker for assessing cortical maturation in pediatric hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Hannah Glick; Emily Deeves; Erin Duncan
Journal:  Otorinolaringologia       Date:  2015-12

7.  Auditory and language skills development after cochlear implantation in children with multiple disabilities.

Authors:  Tamer A Mesallam; Medhat Yousef; Ayna Almasaad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in paediatric patients.

Authors:  F Forli; E Arslan; S Bellelli; S Burdo; P Mancini; A Martini; M Miccoli; N Quaranta; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  A Retrospective Clinical Audit of Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Multiple Disabilities in Comparison with Normal Implantees: A South Indian Experience.

Authors:  Vaishnevy Ganesh; Bhaskar Ram; Raghu Nandhan; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-13

10.  Developmental disabilities and intracranial abnormalities in children with symptomatic cytomegalovirus and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Catherine K Hart; Susan Wiley; Daniel I Choo; Christine Eby; Laura Tucker; Mark Schapiro; Jareen Meinzen-Derr
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.