Literature DB >> 22710555

Cognitive outcomes and familial stress after cochlear implantation in deaf children with and without developmental delays.

John S Oghalai1, Susan E Caudle, Barbara Bentley, Homer Abaya, Jerry Lin, Dian Baker, Claudia Emery, Heather Bortfeld, Jody Winzelberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of cochlear implantation for children with developmental delays (DD) often are unclear. We compared cognition, adaptive behavior, familial stress, and communication in children with and without DD. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Two tertiary care pediatric hospitals. PATIENTS: Two hundred four children who underwent cochlear implantation assessed before and more than 1 year after implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), vineland adaptive behavior scales (VABS), Parental Stress Index, and Preschool Language Scale.
RESULTS: We developed a specific definition of DD for hearing-impaired children based upon diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, criteria for mental retardation; 60 children met the criteria for DD, and 144 children did not. Before implantation, multiple linear regression demonstrated that children with DD had lower scores in every domain of the MSEL and VABS (p < 0.05), but no differences in any domains of the parental stress index and preschool language scale (p > 0.1) compared with children without DD. After implantation, children without DD demonstrated significant improvements in intelligence as measured by the MSEL and age-appropriate improvements in adaptive behavior as evaluated by the VABS, and their familial stress levels were not increased after cochlear implantation. In contrast, children with DD underwent implantation at a later age and demonstrated less comprehensive developmental improvements after cochlear implantation and higher stress levels. However, when the age differences were taken into account using multiple linear regression analyses, the differences between the 2 cohorts were reduced.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that our definition of DD is a reliable method of stratifying deaf children. Although children with DD have a normal developmental rate of adaptive behavior after cochlear implantation, their developmental rate of intelligence is lower, and they have higher stress levels than children without DD. However, our data suggest that if children with DD could be implanted as early as children without DD, their intelligence and stress outcomes would be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710555      PMCID: PMC3399955          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259b72b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  31 in total

1.  Performance of multiply handicapped children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; V Scalchunes; N L Cohen
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Neuropsychological testing in the screening for cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  Walter Kutz; Crystal Wright; Kevin R Krull; Spiros Manolidis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Neonatal hearing loss in the indigent.

Authors:  John S Oghalai; Lei Chen; Megan L Brennan; Ross Tonini; Spiros Manolidis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Patricia J Yoon
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.856

5.  Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: infants with hearing loss.

Authors:  B Cone-Wesson; B R Vohr; Y S Sininger; J E Widen; R C Folsom; M P Gorga; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Follow up of cochlear implanted handicapped children.

Authors:  J Hamzavi; W D Baumgartner; B Egelierler; P Franz; B Schenk; W Gstoettner
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Comprehensive diagnostic battery for evaluating sensorineural hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Jerry W Lin; Naweed Chowdhury; Avni Mody; Ross Tonini; Claudia Emery; Jody Haymond; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John K Niparko; Emily A Tobey; Donna J Thal; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Nancy E Fink
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The outcome of extreme prematurity.

Authors:  J M Lorenz
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amy Isaacs Donaldson; Krista S Heavner; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  The outcome of cochlear implantation among children with genetic syndromes.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani; Rayan Alhussini; Rawan Hudeib; Tuqa Alkaff; Tahera Islam; Abdulrahman Alsanosi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Joint Attention in Hearing Parent-Deaf Child and Hearing Parent-Hearing Child Dyads.

Authors:  Heather Bortfeld; John Oghalai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.379

3.  Assessment of Behavioral Problems in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Caitlin E Fiorillo; Vania Rashidi; Philip M Westgate; Julie A Jacobs; Matthew L Bush; Christina R Studts
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Cochlear implant considerations in children with additional disabilities.

Authors:  C Eduardo Corrales; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

5.  Comparison of Social Interaction between Cochlear-Implanted Children with Normal Intelligence Undergoing Auditory Verbal Therapy and Normal-Hearing Children: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Leila Monshizadeh; Roshanak Vameghi; Firoozeh Sajedi; Fariba Yadegari; Seyed Basir Hashemi; Petra Kirchem; Fatemeh Kasbi
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.