Literature DB >> 15883235

Risk of hospitalization for myocardial infarction among users of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and other NSAIDs: a population-based case-control study.

Søren P Johnsen1, Heidi Larsson, Robert E Tarone, Joseph K McLaughlin, Bente Nørgård, Søren Friis, Henrik T Sørensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain if the excess cardiovascular risk of rofecoxib and celecoxib reported in clinical trials is present in routine practice and whether the use of other nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) also carries an increased cardiovascular risk. We performed a population-based case-control study to examine the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) among users of various categories of nonaspirin NSAIDs.
METHODS: Using data from hospital discharge registries in the counties of North Jutland, Viborg, and Aarhus, Denmark, and the Danish Civil Registration System, we identified 10,280 cases of first-time hospitalization for MI and 102,797 sex- and age-matched non-MI population controls. All prescriptions for nonaspirin NSAIDs filled before the date of admission for MI were identified using population-based prescription databases. Relative risk estimates for MI were adjusted for a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic bronchitis or emphysema, alcoholism, liver cirrhosis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and the use of high-dose aspirin, platelet inhibitors, insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs, antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, oral anticoagulants, nitrates, penicillamine, gold, oral glucocorticoids, and hormone therapy before the date of admission for MI.
RESULTS: Current users of rofecoxib had an elevated risk estimate for hospitalization for MI compared with nonusers of any category of nonaspirin NSAIDs (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-2.21). Increased risk estimates were also found among current users of celecoxib (ARR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.62), other cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (ARR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.93), naproxen (ARR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.99-2.29), and other conventional nonaspirin NSAIDs (ARR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.85). The highest ARRs were found among new users of all examined drug categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Current and new users of all classes of nonaspirin NSAIDs had elevated relative risk estimates for MI. Although the increased risk estimates may partly reflect unmeasured bias, they indicate the need for further examination of the cardiovascular safety of all nonaspirin NSAIDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883235     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.9.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  83 in total

1.  All-cause mortality of elderly Australian veterans using COX-2 selective or non-selective NSAIDs: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Stephen J Kerr; Debra S Rowett; Geoffrey P Sayer; Susan D Whicker; Deborah C Saltman; Andrea Mant
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of incident myocardial infarction and heart failure, and all-cause mortality in the Australian veteran community.

Authors:  Arduino A Mangoni; Richard J Woodman; Paraskevi Gaganis; Andrew L Gilbert; Kathleen M Knights
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Study designs in paediatric pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Katia Verhamme; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Understanding the NSAID related risk of vascular events.

Authors:  Harald E Vonkeman; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-15

Review 5.  Cardiovascular risk with cyclooxygenase inhibitors: general problem with substance specific differences?

Authors:  Irmgard Tegeder; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Using recovery modalities between training sessions in elite athletes: does it help?

Authors:  Anthony Barnett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  [Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular complications].

Authors:  W Seidel; M Hecker; U Wagner; H Häntzschel
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 8.  Clinical use and pharmacological properties of selective COX-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Shaojun Shi; Ulrich Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Approach to managing musculoskeletal pain: acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or traditional NSAIDs?

Authors:  Richard H Hunt; Denis Choquette; Brian N Craig; Carlo De Angelis; Flavio Habal; Gordon Fulthorpe; John I Stewart; Alexander G G Turpie; Paul Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis and acute pain.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.