Katia Verhamme1, Miriam Sturkenboom. 1. Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. k.verhamme@erasmusmc.nl
Abstract
PURPOSE: Few data on the efficacy and safety of drugs in children are available as in the past, these children were not included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data on the efficacy and safety of drugs in children are extrapolated from adults. The EMA recognizes the need for long-term safety studies on various drugs, a need that can best be answered by pharmacoepidemiological studies. In this article, we provide currently available information on study designs within the field of paediatric drug research. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted on all pharmacoepidemiological studies in children. In addition, data from handbooks on pharmacoepidemiology were consulted. Data were reviewed and the relevant literature on study designs in paediatric pharmacoepidemiology is described. RESULTS: The various study designs in pharmacoepidemiology have their specific indications, all with their specific limitations. Case reports and case series are mainly used for signal detection of safety issues whereas case control and cohort studies are used for safety hypothesis testing. Observational studies can be conducted using data from automated databases that guarantee large sample size and long-term follow-up, which is ideal for safety studies, especially in case of rare events. CONCLUSION: Pharmacoepidemiological studies are crucial in research on the safety of drugs in children. Knowledge of the different pharmacoepidemiological methods is important to guarantee optimal use and correct interpretation of the data.
PURPOSE: Few data on the efficacy and safety of drugs in children are available as in the past, these children were not included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data on the efficacy and safety of drugs in children are extrapolated from adults. The EMA recognizes the need for long-term safety studies on various drugs, a need that can best be answered by pharmacoepidemiological studies. In this article, we provide currently available information on study designs within the field of paediatric drug research. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted on all pharmacoepidemiological studies in children. In addition, data from handbooks on pharmacoepidemiology were consulted. Data were reviewed and the relevant literature on study designs in paediatric pharmacoepidemiology is described. RESULTS: The various study designs in pharmacoepidemiology have their specific indications, all with their specific limitations. Case reports and case series are mainly used for signal detection of safety issues whereas case control and cohort studies are used for safety hypothesis testing. Observational studies can be conducted using data from automated databases that guarantee large sample size and long-term follow-up, which is ideal for safety studies, especially in case of rare events. CONCLUSION: Pharmacoepidemiological studies are crucial in research on the safety of drugs in children. Knowledge of the different pharmacoepidemiological methods is important to guarantee optimal use and correct interpretation of the data.
Authors: Antje Neubert; Ian C K Wong; Alessandro Bonifazi; Mariana Catapano; Mariagrazia Felisi; Paola Baiardi; Carlo Giaquinto; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Maisoon A Ghaleb; Adriana Ceci Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Yuka Kiyota; Raisa Levin; Helen Mogun; Jerry Avorn Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Katia M C Verhamme; Alfredo Nicolosi; Macey L Murray; Antje Neubert; Daan Caudri; Gino Picelli; Elif Fatma Sen; Carlo Giaquinto; Luigi Cantarutti; Paola Baiardi; Maria-Grazia Felisi; Adriana Ceci; Ian C K Wong Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-11-24
Authors: Leena K Saastamoinen; Mika Wallin; Piia Lavikainen; Marja S Airaksinen; Andre Sourander; J Simon Bell Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-02-12 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Georgi Nellis; Irja Lutsar; Heili Varendi; Karolin Toompere; Mark A Turner; Jennifer Duncan; Tuuli Metsvaht Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa Journal: Trials Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Osemeke U Osokogu; Julijana Dukanovic; Carmen Ferrajolo; Caitlin Dodd; Alexandra C Pacurariu; Wichor M Bramer; Geert 'tJong; Daniel Weibel; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Florentia Kaguelidou Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 2.890