Literature DB >> 15881515

Blood flow quantification in adults by phase-contrast MRI combined with SENSE--a validation study.

Philipp Beerbaum1, Hermann Körperich, Jürgen Gieseke, Peter Barth, Matthias Peuster, Hans Meyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of rapid free-breathing phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) at different in-plane resolutions combined with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for flow quantification in the great arteries in healthy adult volunteers.
METHODS: In 13 volunteers (mean age 33.0 +/- 7.4 years), blood flow rates in the pulmonary artery (Qp), ascending aorta (Qs), and flow ratio Qp/Qs were determined by PC-MRI with SENSE reduction-factor 2 and 3 (SF-2, SF-3). Additionally, we used PC-MRI with higher spatial in-plane resolution (1.6 x 2.1 mm vs. 2.3 x 3.1 mm) with/without SF-3. Standard (= reference) PC-MRI, which used two excitations (NEX=2), was compared with PC-MRI sequences with NEX=1.
RESULTS: Reduction of signal averages and application of SENSE accelerated flow measurements by a factor of 3.8 (5.5) using PC-MRI with SF-2 (SF-3): Scan time was 36 sec (SF-2) and 25 sec (SF-3) at average heart rate of 69/min. The mean Qp/Qs by reference PC-MRI was 1.03 +/- 0.07 (range, 0.89-1.16), and 1.0 +/- 0.11 (range, 0.86-1.24) by PC-MRI + SF-3, respectively. For blood flow rate through the pulmonary artery and aorta, and for Qp/Qs ratio, we found differences of -3% to +4%. The lower limits of agreement (mean - 2 SD) ranged between -14% and -21%, and upper limits (mean + 2 SD) between +9% and +30%, demonstrating clinically acceptable agreement with standard PC-MRI (Bland-Altman analysis). PC-MRI at higher in-plane resolution both with/without SENSE yielded slightly smaller aortic and pulmonary flows (mean differences 5% to 7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. In adults, PC-MRI may be safely combined with SENSE to reduce scan time for a quantitative flow measurement in the great arteries to "30 seconds. High in-plane resolution was not advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15881515     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-200053538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  8 in total

1.  Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Christian Kremser; Johannes P Schwaiger; Martin Reindl; Johannes Mair; Silvana Müller; Agnes Mayr; Wolfgang-Michael Franz; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Calvin D Lew; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Daniel M Spielman; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Adaptations of aortic and pulmonary artery flow parameters measured by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography during supine aerobic exercise.

Authors:  Guido E Pieles; Gergely Szantho; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Christopher B Lawton; A Graham Stuart; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Mark S Turner; Craig A Williams; Robert M R Tulloh; Mark C K Hamilton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Accelerated phase-contrast cine MRI using k-t SPARSE-SENSE.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Ricardo Otazo; Li Feng; Daniel K Sodickson; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Independent validation of metric optimized gating for fetal cardiovascular phase-contrast flow imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Bidhult; Johannes Töger; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Erik Hedström
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Echo planar imaging-induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification.

Authors:  Jos J M Westenberg; Hans C van Assen; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Jelle J Goeman; Hicham Saaid; Jason Voorneveld; Johan Bosch; Sasa Kenjeres; Tom Claessens; Pankaj Garg; Marc Kouwenhoven; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Towards highly accelerated Cartesian time-resolved 3D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Daniel Giese; James Wong; Gerald F Greil; Martin Buehrer; Tobias Schaeffter; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.