Literature DB >> 15876659

Tunable retina encoders for retina implants: why and how.

Rolf Eckmiller1, Dirk Neumann, Oliver Baruth.   

Abstract

Current research towards retina implants for partial restoration of vision in blind humans with retinal degenerative dysfunctions focuses on implant and stimulation experiments and technologies. In contrast, our approach takes the availability of an epiretinal multi-electrode neural interface for granted and studies the conditions for successful joint information processing of both retinal prosthesis and brain. Our proposed learning retina encoder (RE) includes information processing modules to simulate the complex mapping operation of parts of the 5-layered neural retina and to provide an iterative, perception-based dialog between RE and human subject. Alternative information processing technologies in the learning RE are being described, which allow an individual optimization of the RE mapping operation by means of iterative tuning with learning algorithms in a dialog between implant wearing subject and RE. The primate visual system is modeled by a retina module (RM) composed of spatio-temporal (ST) filters and a central visual system module (VM). RM performs a mapping 1 of an optical pattern P1 in the physical domain onto a retinal output vector R1(t) in a neural domain, whereas VM performs a mapping 2 of R1(t) in a neural domain onto a visual percept P2 in the perceptual domain. Retinal ganglion cell properties represent non-invertible ST filters in RE, which generate ambiguous output signals. VM generates visual percepts only if the corresponding R1(t) is properly encoded, contains sufficient information, and can be disambiguated. Based on the learning RE and the proposed visual system model, a novel retina encoder (RE*) is proposed, which considers both ambiguity removal and miniature eye movements during fixation. Our simulation results suggest that VM requires miniature eye movements under control of the visual system to retrieve unambiguous patterns P2 corresponding to P1. For retina implant applications, RE* can be tuned to generate optimal ganglion cell codes for epiretinal stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876659     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/1/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  13 in total

1.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  [Development of a minimally invasive retinal implant system].

Authors:  H Gerding
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 4.  Building the bionic eye: an emerging reality and opportunity.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Retinal prosthetic strategy with the capacity to restore normal vision.

Authors:  Sheila Nirenberg; Chethan Pandarinath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Retinitis pigmentosa: a brief overview.

Authors:  S Natarajan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Decoding brain responses to pixelized images in the primary visual cortex: implications for visual cortical prostheses.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Guo; Xiao-Lin Zheng; Zhen-Gang Lu; Xing Wang; Zheng-Qin Yin; Wen-Sheng Hou; Ming Meng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Xiaohong Sui; Yiliang Lu; Yan Yan; Chuanqing Zhou; Liming Li; Qiushi Ren; Xinyu Chai
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.