Literature DB >> 15875987

Predicting true patterns of cognitive performance from noisy data.

W Todd Maddox1, W K Estes.   

Abstract

Starting from the premise that the purpose of cognitive modeling is to gain information about the cognitive processes of individuals, we develop a general theoretical framework for assessment of models on the basis of tests of the models' ability to yield information about the true performance patterns of individual subjects and the processes underlying them. To address the central problem that observed performance is a composite of true performance and error, we present formal derivations concerning inference from noisy data to true performance. Analyses of model fits to simulated data illustrate the usefulness of our approach for coping with difficult issues of model identifiability and testability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875987     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  How to Assess a Model's Testability and Identifiability.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Model Comparisons and Model Selections Based on Generalization Criterion Methodology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.

Authors:  W K Estes; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; S E Clark; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; R Ratcliff; S E Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition.

Authors:  W K Estes; W T Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

10.  Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance.

Authors:  W K Estes; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual classification learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Grant C Baldwin; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

2.  Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance.

Authors:  W K Estes; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Choking and excelling under pressure in experienced classifiers.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.