Literature DB >> 10733863

Model Comparisons and Model Selections Based on Generalization Criterion Methodology.

.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to formalize the generalization criterion method for model comparison. The method has the potential to provide powerful comparisons of complex and nonnested models that may also differ in terms of numbers of parameters. The generalization criterion differs from the better known cross-validation criterion in the following critical procedure. Although both employ a calibration stage to estimate parameters, cross-validation employs a replication sample from the same design for the validation stage, whereas generalization employs a new design for the critical stage. Two examples of the generalization criterion method are presented that demonstrate its usefulness for selecting a model based on sound scientific principles out of a set that also contains models lacking sound scientific principles that are either overly complex or oversimplified. The main advantage of the generalization criterion is its reliance on extrapolations to new conditions. After all, accurate a priori predictions to new conditions are the hallmark of a good scientific theory. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Year:  2000        PMID: 10733863     DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  30 in total

1.  Working memory and decision-making biases in young adults with a family history of alcoholism: studies from the Oklahoma family health patterns project.

Authors:  William R Lovallo; Eldad Yechiam; Kristen H Sorocco; Andrea S Vincent; Frank L Collins
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Predicting true patterns of cognitive performance from noisy data.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; W K Estes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

4.  Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  Unpacking buyer-seller differences in valuation from experience: A cognitive modeling approach.

Authors:  Thorsten Pachur; Benjamin Scheibehenne
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

6.  Comparing time-accuracy curves: beyond goodness-of-fit measures.

Authors:  Charles C Liu; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

7.  Model evaluation using grouped or individual data.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Adam N Sanborn; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

8.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

9.  A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2017-05-29

10.  Older Adults are Highly Responsive to Recent Events During Decision-Making.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; A Ross Otto; Bradley B Doll; Kaileigh A Byrne; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Decisions       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.