Literature DB >> 6219184

Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey.

S F Sands, C E Lincoln, A A Wright.   

Abstract

The organization of visual memory for pictures was studied in the rhesus monkey. Two monkeys were tested in a same/different task in which sequentially presented pictures were compared to each other in a pair-wise fashion. The resulting confusion matrixes were analyzed using a multidimensional scaling procedure to obtain two- and three-dimensional graphic representations of the stimulus space. In Experiment 1, the monkeys' confusion errors caused pictures of human and rhesus monkey faces to fall in the same region of multidimensional space, which suggested that the monkeys categorized facial stimuli. A similar effect was found for pictures of different types of fruit. Experiment 2 replicated the categorization of faces with a more diverse collection of human and nonhuman primate faces. Experiment 3 explored the fruit category by varying stimulus attributes orthogonally. The results from this experiment showed that both monkeys encoded the pictures in this category by type of fruit (apples or grapes) and color (red or yellow). Taken together, these studies indicate that rhesus monkeys will treat some classes of pictorial stimuli categorically in visual memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6219184     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.4.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  9 in total

1.  Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Kate L Freiburger; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

2.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Evolutionary Constraints on Human Object Perception.

Authors:  Sarah E Koopman; Bradford Z Mahon; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

6.  Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2009-05-01

7.  Contextual Congruency Effect in Natural Scene Categorization: Different Strategies in Humans and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Anne-Claire Collet; Denis Fize; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Mirjam Meys; Jerzy Bodurka; Rainer Goebel; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-22

9.  Character displacement of Cercopithecini primate visual signals.

Authors:  William L Allen; Martin Stevens; James P Higham
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.