Literature DB >> 15875322

What's in a name for memory errors? Implications and ethical issues arising from the use of the term "false memory" for errors in memory for details.

Anne P DePrince1, Carolyn B Allard, Hannah Oh, Jennifer J Freyd.   

Abstract

The term "false memories" has been used to refer to suggestibility experiments in which whole events are apparently confabulated and in media accounts of contested memories of childhood abuse. Since 1992 psychologists have increasingly used the term "false memory" when discussing memory errors for details, such as specific words within lists. Use of the term to refer to errors in details is a shift in language away from other terms used historically (e.g., "memory intrusions"). We empirically examine this shift in language and discuss implications of the new use of the term "false memories." Use of the term presents serious ethical challenges to the data-interpretation process by encouraging over-generalization and misapplication of research findings on word memory to social issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875322     DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb1403_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  3 in total

Review 1.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  False memory ≠ false memory: DRM errors are unrelated to the misinformation effect.

Authors:  James Ost; Hartmut Blank; Joanna Davies; Georgina Jones; Katie Lambert; Kelly Salmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.