Literature DB >> 9680574

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.

D S Willig1, P A Turski, R Frayne, V B Graves, F R Korosec, J S Swan, C A Mistretta, T M Grist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the delineation of stenosis at the carotid artery bifurcation on three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) images with that on two-dimensional (2D) and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiographic images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 29 carotid artery bifurcations and symptoms of cerebral ischemia underwent 3D MR DSA. A time-resolved series was generated with 3D MR DSA after the bolus injection of gadodiamide. The resolution for a carotid artery examination was 0.4 x 0.4 x 1.0 mm, with volumes reconstructed at 4.5-second intervals. The 3D MR DSA images were compared with contemporaneously acquired unenhanced 2D and 3D TOF images. Two observers ranked the 2D and 3D TOF MR angiographic and 3D MR DSA images according to the following: (a) stenosis delineation, (b) internal carotid artery delineation, (c) intravascular signal intensity, and (d) diagnostic confidence.
RESULTS: The mean ranking for diagnostic confidence was 1.10 (1 = best technique, 3 = worst technique) for 3D MR DSA. Compared with the pooled 2D TOF and 3D TOF ranks, the 3D MR DSA rank was significantly better (P < .01). Similar levels of statistical significance were found for the other criteria.
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional MR DSA improves the delineation of carotid arterial stenosis by virtually eliminating saturation effects and reducing intravoxel dephasing. Surface morphology and nearly occluded vessels ("string sign") were easily identified. Confidence in identifying carotid arterial occlusions was also very high with this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680574     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes.

Authors:  S Aoki; H Nakajima; H Kumagai; T Araki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The emergence of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for intracranial angiography.

Authors:  Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Dose optimization of contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography.

Authors:  M Unterweger; J M Froehlich; R A Kubik-Huch; B Seifert; M Birrer; T Huber; R Otto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality.

Authors:  X Leclerc; L Nicol; J Y Gauvrit; V Le Thuc; D Leys; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms.

Authors:  H R Jäger; H Ellamushi; E A Moore; J P Grieve; N D Kitchen; W J Taylor
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Comparison of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography for the evaluation of distal intracranial branch occlusions in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Janice J Yang; Michael D Hill; William F Morrish; Mark E Hudon; Philip A Barber; Andrew M Demchuk; Robert J Sevick; Richard Frayne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  2D Thick-section MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  N Horie; M Morikawa; N Kitigawa; K Tsutsumi; M Kaminogo; I Nagata
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.