V P Doria-Rose1, P A Newcomb, T R Levin. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave North, M4-B402, PO Box 19024, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. pdoriaro@fhcrc.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several previous studies have found that females and older individuals are at greater risk of having incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy. However, no prior study has reported the subsequent risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) following incomplete sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Using data from 55 791 individuals screened as part of the Colon Cancer Prevention (CoCaP) programme of Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, we evaluated the likelihood of having an inadequate (<40 cm) examination by age and sex, and estimated the risk of distal CRC according to depth of sigmoidoscope insertion at the baseline screening examination. Multivariate estimation of risks was performed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Older individuals were at a much greater risk of having an inadequate examination (relative risk (RR) for age 80+ years compared with 50-59 years 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-3.0)), as were females (RR 2.3 (95% CI 2.2-2.5)); these associations were attenuated but remained strong if Poisson models were further adjusted for examination limitations (pain, stool, and angulation). There was an approximate threefold increase in the risk of distal CRC if the baseline sigmoidoscopy did not reach a depth of at least 40 cm; a smaller increase in risk was observed for examinations that reached 40-59 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Older individuals and women are at an increased risk of having inadequate sigmoidoscopy. Because inadequate sigmoidoscopy results in an increased risk of subsequent CRC, physicians should consider steps to maximise the depth of insertion of the sigmoidoscope or, failing this, should consider an alternative screening test.
BACKGROUND: Several previous studies have found that females and older individuals are at greater risk of having incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy. However, no prior study has reported the subsequent risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) following incomplete sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Using data from 55 791 individuals screened as part of the Colon Cancer Prevention (CoCaP) programme of Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, we evaluated the likelihood of having an inadequate (<40 cm) examination by age and sex, and estimated the risk of distal CRC according to depth of sigmoidoscope insertion at the baseline screening examination. Multivariate estimation of risks was performed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Older individuals were at a much greater risk of having an inadequate examination (relative risk (RR) for age 80+ years compared with 50-59 years 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-3.0)), as were females (RR 2.3 (95% CI 2.2-2.5)); these associations were attenuated but remained strong if Poisson models were further adjusted for examination limitations (pain, stool, and angulation). There was an approximate threefold increase in the risk of distal CRC if the baseline sigmoidoscopy did not reach a depth of at least 40 cm; a smaller increase in risk was observed for examinations that reached 40-59 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Older individuals and women are at an increased risk of having inadequate sigmoidoscopy. Because inadequate sigmoidoscopy results in an increased risk of subsequent CRC, physicians should consider steps to maximise the depth of insertion of the sigmoidoscope or, failing this, should consider an alternative screening test.
Authors: B P Saunders; M Fukumoto; S Halligan; C Jobling; M E Moussa; C I Bartram; C B Williams Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Maida J Sewitch; Pascal Burtin; Martin Dawes; Mark Yaffe; Linda Snell; Mark Roper; Patrizia Zanelli; Alan Pavilanis Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; William D Hazelton; Andrew G Renehan; E Georg Luebeck Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Paul F Pinsky; V Paul Doria-Rose; Andrew K Sanderson; Robert Bresalier; Joel Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Pamela M Marcus; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Joel L Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Robert S Bresalier; V Paul Doria-Rose; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Timothy Church; Lance A Yokochi; Susan Yurgalevitch; Joshua Rathmell; Gerald L Andriole; Saundra Buys; E David Crawford; Mona Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Lois Lamerato; Douglas Reding; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Clinton Burnside; Maryam A Laiyemo; John Kwagyan; Carla D Williams; Kolapo A Idowu; Hassan Ashktorab; Angesom Kibreab; Victor F Scott; Andrew K Sanderson Journal: World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-08-06