G M Woolhead1, J L Donovan, P A Dieppe. 1. Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. Gillian.Woolhead@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients' experiences of outcome from a total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 patients 3 months before TKR, with 10 interviewed again 6 months after surgery. Patients were purposively sampled to include a range of demographic characteristics. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Methods of constant comparison were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Individuals struggled to make sense of their outcome and often described it in contradictory terms. When asked directly, most reported a good outcome, but further discussion revealed concern and discomfort with continuing pain and mobility difficulties. These apparently contradictory accounts were consistent with the presentation of public and private views, were dependent on the context of patients' lives, and represented an adaptation to their changed health state. CONCLUSION: Individuals reported their outcome from TKR as good despite the continued experience of pain and immobility. Although TKR has been shown to be a highly effective procedure using quantitative methods, they may need to be qualified by these qualitative findings.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients' experiences of outcome from a total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 patients 3 months before TKR, with 10 interviewed again 6 months after surgery. Patients were purposively sampled to include a range of demographic characteristics. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Methods of constant comparison were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Individuals struggled to make sense of their outcome and often described it in contradictory terms. When asked directly, most reported a good outcome, but further discussion revealed concern and discomfort with continuing pain and mobility difficulties. These apparently contradictory accounts were consistent with the presentation of public and private views, were dependent on the context of patients' lives, and represented an adaptation to their changed health state. CONCLUSION: Individuals reported their outcome from TKR as good despite the continued experience of pain and immobility. Although TKR has been shown to be a highly effective procedure using quantitative methods, they may need to be qualified by these qualitative findings.
Authors: Sara R Piva; Gustavo J Almeida; Alexandra B Gil; Anthony M DiGioia; Diane L Helsel; Gwendolyn A Sowa Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christian-Dominik Peterlein; Markus Dietmar Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Friedrich Georg Scherf Journal: Chir Organi Mov Date: 2009-10-30
Authors: Helen Razmjou; Joel A Finkelstein; Albert Yee; Richard Holtby; Marjan Vidmar; Michael Ford Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Sara R Piva; Alexandra B Gil; Gustavo J M Almeida; Anthony M DiGioia; Timothy J Levison; G Kelley Fitzgerald Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2010-04-08
Authors: Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Robert R Edwards; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Michael T Smith; Brendan Klick; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.037