OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a comprehensive behavioral intervention (CBI) program that combines intense exercises with an education program, to be implemented at a later stage (3 months) following total knee replacement (TKR), and to get a first impression of the effects of the CBI as compared to a standard of care exercise (SCE) program on the outcomes of physical function and physical activity. METHODS: A total of 44 subjects participated in a 3-month program of eitherCBI or SCE, followed by 3 months of a home exercise program. Outcomes of physical function and physical activity were measured at baseline and at 6-month followup. Analysis of variance was used to compare statistical differences between groups, whereas responder analyses were used for clinically important differences. RESULTS: The CBI was found to be safe and well tolerated. As compared to the SCE group, the CBI group had less pain (P = 0.035) and better physical function based on the Short Form 36 health survey (P = 0.017) and the single-leg stance test (P = 0.037). The other outcome measures did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Results from the responder analysis demonstrated that the CBI group had a 36% higher rate of responders in physical function as compared to the SCE group. Also, the CBI group had 23% more responders in the combined domains of physical function and physical activity. CONCLUSION: The CBI program is feasible and improves physical function and physical activity in patients several months after TKR. Larger pragmatic randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of this study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a comprehensive behavioral intervention (CBI) program that combines intense exercises with an education program, to be implemented at a later stage (3 months) following total knee replacement (TKR), and to get a first impression of the effects of the CBI as compared to a standard of care exercise (SCE) program on the outcomes of physical function and physical activity. METHODS: A total of 44 subjects participated in a 3-month program of either CBI or SCE, followed by 3 months of a home exercise program. Outcomes of physical function and physical activity were measured at baseline and at 6-month followup. Analysis of variance was used to compare statistical differences between groups, whereas responder analyses were used for clinically important differences. RESULTS: The CBI was found to be safe and well tolerated. As compared to the SCE group, the CBI group had less pain (P = 0.035) and better physical function based on the Short Form 36 health survey (P = 0.017) and the single-leg stance test (P = 0.037). The other outcome measures did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Results from the responder analysis demonstrated that the CBI group had a 36% higher rate of responders in physical function as compared to the SCE group. Also, the CBI group had 23% more responders in the combined domains of physical function and physical activity. CONCLUSION: The CBI program is feasible and improves physical function and physical activity in patients several months after TKR. Larger pragmatic randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of this study.
Authors: J David Curb; Clementina D Ceria-Ulep; Beatriz L Rodriguez; John Grove; Jack Guralnik; Brad J Willcox; Tim A Donlon; Kamal H Masaki; Randi Chen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael P Ast; Matthew P Abdel; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Allison V Ruel; Geoffrey H Westrich Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Gustavo J Almeida; Carolyn A Schroeder; Alexandra B Gil; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Sara R Piva Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kristin J Konnyu; Louise M Thoma; Wangnan Cao; Roy K Aaron; Orestis A Panagiotou; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Gaelen P Adam; Ethan M Balk; Dan Pinto Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2022-03-12 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Rowland W Chang; Dorothy D Dunlop; David E Conroy; Jungwha Lee; Linda Van Horn; Bonnie Spring; Kenzie A Cameron Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Gustavo J Almeida; Lauren Terhorst; James J Irrgang; G Kelley Fitzgerald; John M Jakicic; Sara R Piva Journal: J Exerc Sports Orthop Date: 2017-12-06
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Jungwha Lee; Katherine E DeVivo; Courtnee E Harpine; Daniel J Del Gaizo; Sara Wilcox Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-06-18