Literature DB >> 20145750

Relationship between Preoperative Patient Characteristics and Expectations in Candidates for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Helen Razmjou1, Joel A Finkelstein, Albert Yee, Richard Holtby, Marjan Vidmar, Michael Ford.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between patient expectations for improvement following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and patient preoperative characteristics.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of preoperative expectations. Expectations for improvement were evaluated in six distinct domains. The baseline factors used as independent variables were age, gender, presence of comorbidity, sub-domains of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; pain, stiffness, physical limitation related to lower extremity), and SF-36 physical and mental health component scores. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the relationships between dependent and independent variables.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 236 candidates for TKA (154 women and 82 men, mean age 67, SD = 9.98). Expectations were high on average. Presence of comorbidity was associated with expectations of pain relief. Preoperative mental health was related to expectations for a return to activities of daily living; age, gender, physical health, and mental health were related to expectations for improved leisure, recreational, and sports activities. Preoperative physical health was related to expectations for potential return to full recovery. No baseline factors were associated with expectations for improved range of motion or for providing care to and interacting with others.
CONCLUSION: Expectations related to recovery from surgery appeared to have distinct dimensions and were associated with patient baseline characteristics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  osteoarthritis; preoperative expectations; total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2009        PMID: 20145750      PMCID: PMC2788315          DOI: 10.3138/physio.61.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  25 in total

Review 1.  Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization.

Authors:  P Dieppe; H D Basler; J Chard; P Croft; J Dixon; M Hurley; S Lohmander; H Raspe
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Ordinal regression model and the linear regression model were superior to the logistic regression models.

Authors:  Colleen M Norris; William A Ghali; L Duncan Saunders; Rollin Brant; Diane Galbraith; Peter Faris; Merril L Knudtson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Overall long-term impact of total hip and knee joint replacement surgery on patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J R Kirwan; H L Currey; M A Freeman; S Snow; P J Young
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-04

Review 4.  Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter; S Lohmander
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity.

Authors:  M Kosinski; S D Keller; J E Ware; H T Hatoum; S X Kong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.

Authors:  W M Hopman; T Towheed; T Anastassiades; A Tenenhouse; S Poliquin; C Berger; L Joseph; J P Brown; T M Murray; J D Adachi; D A Hanley; E Papadimitropoulos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; R John Wright; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Problems in the conceptual framework of patient satisfaction research: an empirical exploration.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Hopkins
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1983-11

9.  Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C M Callahan; B G Drake; D A Heck; R S Dittus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Suzanne Graziano; Lisa M Briskie; Margaret G E Peterson; Paul M Pellicci; Eduardo A Salvati; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Factors contributing to failure of rotator cuff surgery in persons with work-related injuries.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Sandra Lincoln; Terry Axelrod; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Characterizing patients' expectations in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Anisah Mahomed; Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Disability and satisfaction after rotator cuff decompression or repair: a sex and gender analysis.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Aileen M Davis; Susan B Jaglal; Richard Holtby; Robin R Richards
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Cross-sectional analysis of baseline differences of candidates for rotator cuff surgery: a sex and gender perspective.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Aileen M Davis; Susan B Jaglal; Richard Holtby; Robin R Richards
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Construct validation and correlates of preoperative expectations of postsurgical recovery in persons undergoing knee replacement: baseline findings from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; James Slover; Dennis Ang; Robert A Perera; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Jannis Alberts; Bernd Löwe; Maja Alicia Glahn; Keith Petrie; Johannes Laferton; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Meike Shedden-Mora
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.