Literature DB >> 15869390

Ligand-target interactions: what can we learn from NMR?

Teresa Carlomagno1.   

Abstract

The conformation of the ligand in complex with a macromolecular target can be studied by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in solution for both tightly and weakly forming complexes. In the weak binding regime (k(off) > 10(4) Hz), the structure of the bound ligand is accessible also for very large complexes (>100 kDa), which are not amenable to NMR studies in the tight binding regime. Here I review the state-of-the-art NMR methodology used for screening ligands and for the structural investigation of bound ligand conformations, in both tight and weak binding regimes. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are critically described. The NMR methodology used to investigate transiently forming complexes has expanded considerably in the past few years, opening new possibilities for a detailed description of ligand-target interactions. Novel methods for the determination of the bound ligand conformation, in particular transferred cross-correlated relaxation, are thoroughly reviewed, and their advantages with respect to established methodology are discussed, using the epothilone-tubulin complex as a primary example.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869390     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct        ISSN: 1056-8700


  19 in total

Review 1.  Solution NMR of large molecules and assemblies.

Authors:  Mark P Foster; Craig A McElroy; Carlos D Amero
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Conformational transitions induced in heparin octasaccharides by binding with antithrombin III.

Authors:  Marco Guerrini; Sara Guglieri; Daniela Beccati; Giangiacomo Torri; Christian Viskov; Pierre Mourier
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Backbone dynamics in an intramolecular prolylpeptide-SH3 complex from the diphtheria toxin repressor, DtxR.

Authors:  Nilakshee Bhattacharya; Myunggi Yi; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Timothy M Logan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  The neurobiologist's guide to structural biology: a primer on why macromolecular structure matters and how to evaluate structural data.

Authors:  Daniel L Minor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Study of non-covalent interactions between MRI contrast agents and human serum albumin by NMR diffusometry.

Authors:  C Henoumont; L Vander Elst; S Laurent; Robert N Muller
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Transferred NOESY NMR studies of biotin mimetic peptide (FSHPQNT) bound to streptavidin: a structural model for studies of peptide-protein interactions.

Authors:  Dawit Gizachew; Edward Dratz
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.817

7.  Auto-FACE: an NMR based binding site mapping program for fast chemical exchange protein-ligand systems.

Authors:  Janarthanan Krishnamoorthy; Victor C K Yu; Yu-Keung Mok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  High-field solution NMR spectroscopy as a tool for assessing protein interactions with small molecule ligands.

Authors:  Andria L Skinner; Jennifer S Laurence
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  The description of protein internal motions aids selection of ligand binding poses by the INPHARMA method.

Authors:  Benjamin Stauch; Julien Orts; Teresa Carlomagno
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Comparison of the sensitivities of WaterLOGSY and saturation transfer difference NMR experiments.

Authors:  Aleksandar Antanasijevic; Benjamin Ramirez; Michael Caffrey
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.