Literature DB >> 15867903

Appetite: measurement and manipulation misgivings.

Richard D Mattes1, James Hollis, Dayle Hayes, Albert J Stunkard.   

Abstract

Humans appear to have a genotype that permits, or even encourages, an energy intake that is greater than energy expenditure when food is available. This was functional throughout most of human evolution but is less so in the current environment of inexpensive, palatable, and readily available foods. To achieve dietary goals of weight loss or maintenance, attempts have been made to influence appetitive sensations through the manipulation of the physical properties of foods, their composition, or their pattern of consumption. This has led to limited success, in part, because measurement of appetitive sensations is difficult but, more fundamentally, because the association between appetite and food choice or intake is not robust. This article critically reviews the most common methods for assessment of appetite and the effects of selected food constituents on appetitive sensations. Translation of current knowledge to dietetic practice must be made cautiously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867903     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  19 in total

1.  The time-varying association between perceived stress and hunger within and between days.

Authors:  Jimi Huh; Mariya Shiyko; Stefan Keller; Genevieve Dunton; Susan M Schembre
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 2.  Relationships between human thirst, hunger, drinking, and feeding.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Jenny A Houchins; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-04-13

3.  High-Protein and High-Dietary Fiber Breakfasts Result in Equal Feelings of Fullness and Better Diet Quality in Low-Income Preschoolers Compared with Their Usual Breakfast.

Authors:  Sibylle Kranz; Mary Brauchla; Wayne W Campbell; Rickard D Mattes; Amy J Schwichtenberg
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Measuring Appetite with the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire Identifies Hospitalised Older People at Risk of Worse Health Outcomes.

Authors:  A L Pilgrim; D Baylis; K A Jameson; C Cooper; A A Sayer; S M Robinson; H C Roberts
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Project TwEATs. A feasibility study testing the use of automated text messaging to monitor appetite ratings in a free-living population.

Authors:  Susan M Schembre; Jessica Yuen
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Sylvia B Rowe; Sarah D Ohlhorst; Andrew W Brown; Daniel J Hoffman; DeAnn J Liska; Edith J M Feskens; Jaapna Dhillon; Katherine L Tucker; Leonard H Epstein; Lynnette M Neufeld; Michael Kelley; Naomi K Fukagawa; Roger A Sunde; Steven H Zeisel; Anthony J Basile; Laura E Borth; Emahlea Jackson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 7.  Eating Behaviors and Weight Development in Obesity-Prone Children and the Importance of the Research of Albert J. Stunkard.

Authors:  Tanja V E Kral
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-03

8.  Thirst-drinking, hunger-eating; tight coupling?

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; James H Hollis; George P McCabe; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-03

9.  An overview of appetite decline in older people.

Authors:  Anna L Pilgrim; Sian M Robinson; Avan Aihie Sayer; Helen C Roberts
Journal:  Nurs Older People       Date:  2015-06

10.  Popcorn is more satiating than potato chips in normal-weight adults.

Authors:  Von Nguyen; Lisa Cooper; Joshua Lowndes; Kathleen Melanson; Theodore J Angelopoulos; James M Rippe; Kristin Reimers
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.