Literature DB >> 15867208

Mining the tumor phosphoproteome for cancer markers.

Yoon Pin Lim1.   

Abstract

Despite decades of cancer research, mortality rates remain high largely due to the failure of early detection, poor understanding of the epidemiology of rational drug targets, and molecular etiology of human cancers. The discovery of disease markers promises to deliver some solutions to these formidable challenges. Gene and protein expression profiling through DNA microarray and proteomics have already made a tremendous effect in this area. However, protein/gene expression does not necessarily reflect protein activity, which is often regulated via post-translation modifications, of which phosphorylation is one of the most prominent. This is an important consideration because the activity of protein is a more relevant phenotype than its expression during pathogenesis. Tyrosine kinases represent a very important class of enzymes that are critical regulators of mitogenic and angiogenic signaling, hence attractive targets for anticancer drugs as exemplified by BCR-ABL and ErbB2. More than 50% of them are overexpressed or mutated resulting in a gain of function in various human cancers. In this review, we discuss the potential effect of phosphoproteins as cancer markers in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. Phosphoproteomics strategies that might pave the way to high-throughput analysis for routine clinical applications are also described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867208     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  22 in total

Review 1.  Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology: contributions of protein life-cycle, use of evidence-based methods and data normalization on interpretation of immunohistochemical stains.

Authors:  Halliday A Idikio
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 2.  Application of Proteomics Technologies in Oil Palm Research.

Authors:  Benjamin Yii Chung Lau; Abrizah Othman; Umi Salamah Ramli
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Electrostatic Interactions between OmpG Nanopore and Analyte Protein Surface Can Distinguish between Glycosylated Isoforms.

Authors:  Monifa A Fahie; Min Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Alternative synthetic tools to phospho-specific antibodies for phosphoproteome analysis: progress and prospects.

Authors:  James I Murray; Alan C Spivey; Rudiger Woscholski
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2013-07-09

Review 5.  Phosphorylation: Implications in Cancer.

Authors:  Vishakha Singh; Mahendra Ram; Rajesh Kumar; Raju Prasad; Birendra Kumar Roy; Kaushal Kumar Singh
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Fluorescent polymer-based post-translational differentiation and subtyping of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Michael D Scott; Rinku Dutta; Manas K Haldar; Anil Wagh; Thomas R Gustad; Benedict Law; Daniel L Friesner; Sanku Mallik
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Identifying differentially regulated subnetworks from phosphoproteomic data.

Authors:  Martin Klammer; Klaus Godl; Andreas Tebbe; Christoph Schaab
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Systems biology coupled with label-free high-throughput detection as a novel approach for diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Joanna L Richens; Richard A Urbanowicz; Elizabeth A M Lunt; Rebecca Metcalf; Jonathan Corne; Lucy Fairclough; Paul O'Shea
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-04-22

9.  Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis of lysophosphatidic acid induced chemotaxis applying dual-step (18)O labeling coupled with immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography.

Authors:  Shi-Jian Ding; Yingchun Wang; Jon M Jacobs; Wei-Jun Qian; Feng Yang; Aleksey V Tolmachev; Xiuxia Du; Wei Wang; Ronald J Moore; Matthew E Monroe; Samuel O Purvine; Katrina Waters; Tyler H Heibeck; Joshua N Adkins; David G Camp; Richard L Klemke; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Gain and loss of phosphorylation sites in human cancer.

Authors:  Predrag Radivojac; Peter H Baenziger; Maricel G Kann; Matthew E Mort; Matthew W Hahn; Sean D Mooney
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.