Literature DB >> 15864604

History of negative colorectal endoscopy and risk of rectosigmoid neoplasms at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Luigina Bonelli1, Stefania Sciallero, Carlo Senore, Marco Zappa, Hugo Aste, Bruno Andreoni, Donato Angioli, Roberto Ferraris, Stefano Gasperoni, Giuseppe Malfitana, Marco Pennazio, Wendy Atkin, Nereo Segnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Screening sigmoidoscopy can reduce incidence of colorectal cancer and mortality. The optimal re-screening interval has not yet been defined. This study is aimed at estimating the risk of distal advanced adenomas (diameter >/=10 mm, villous component >20%, high-grade dysplasia) and cancer at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in subjects aged 55-64 years who reported pre-screening negative colorectal endoscopy. PATIENTS: Eight thousands two hundred two subjects aged 55-64 years who underwent screening flexible sigmoidoscopy within the SCORE trial in Italy and who were able to report their previous history of colorectal endoscopy.
RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty three of 8,202 subjects (10.8%) reported at least one prescreening negative endoscopy: among them, after 3-5 years, 6-10 years and >10 years intervals between last reported examination and screening endoscopy, the Absolute Risk of advanced adenomas was 1.5%, 0.9% and 0.9%; one cancer was detected (0.1%). Among the 7,319 subjects who did not report prescreening endoscopy the risks of advanced adenoma and cancer were 3.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Subjects with a previous colorectal examination had a 65% decreased risk of advanced adenomas (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.18-0.66) and a 71% decreased risk of cancer (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.04-1.12) as compared to those who did not. For subjects without family history of colorectal cancer the statistically significant decrease of the risk persisted up to ten years. The observed benefit seems not to apply to subjects with family history of colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the interval between screening sigmoidoscopies could be safely expanded beyond 5 years for subjects without specific risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864604     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0775-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  41 in total

1.  Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Barry E Storer; Libby M Morimoto; Allyson Templeton; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Compliance and findings in a Swedish population screened for colorectal cancer with sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  J Blom; A Lidén; B Jeppsson; L Holmberg; L Påhlman
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  The interval between flexible sigmoidoscopy screening examinations can be expanded beyond five years.

Authors:  M Yoshinaga; R Watabe; J Yanagisawa; N Harada; S Motomura; H Nawata; K Ikeda
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

4.  Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas in first-degree asymptomatic relatives of patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  S Fossi; F Bazzoli; L Ricciardiello; G Nicolini; R M Zagari; P Pozzato; D Palli; E Roda
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal neoplasia in average-risk people: evaluation of a five-year rescreening interval.

Authors:  Cameron F E Platell; Gillian Philpott; John K Olynyk
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study.

Authors:  N J Talley; A L Weaver; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population.

Authors:  R Jones; S Lydeard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-11

9.  Colorectal cancer screening adherence in a general population.

Authors:  Mark W Yeazel; Timothy R Church; Resa M Jones; Laura K Kochevar; Gavin D Watt; Jill E Cordes; Deborah Engelhard; Steven J Mongin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy.

Authors:  C-D Chen; M-F Yen; W-M Wang; J-M Wong; T H-H Chen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?

Authors:  H Brenner; J Chang-Claude; C M Seiler; T Stürmer; M Hoffmeister
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Is There a Place for Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy?

Authors:  Doron Boltin; Yaron Niv
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-03

3.  Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer makes screening sigmoidoscopy less useful for identifying carriers of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Paul Rozen; Irena Liphshitz; Micha Barchana
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.