Literature DB >> 12477473

Compliance and findings in a Swedish population screened for colorectal cancer with sigmoidoscopy.

J Blom1, A Lidén, B Jeppsson, L Holmberg, L Påhlman.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of compliance and the frequency of adenomas and neoplasms in a Swedish population.
METHODS: In 1996, 2000 men and women born in 1935 or 1936 were selected at random from the population registers of Uppsala and Malmö/Lund. All subjects were invited by mail to participate. In a randomised study design, subjects were either called up by a nurse to schedule the appointment for sigmoidoscopy or instructed to call themselves. At sigmoidoscopy subjects with a cancer, an adenoma (neoplastic polyp) or more than three hyperplastic polyps were scheduled for a complete colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent (770/1988) of all the invited subjects had a sigmoidoscopy. The participation differed between the two centres, 47% at the Uppsala centre and 30% at the Malmö/Lund centre (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the two different invitation groups. In all, 98 subjects (13%) were planned for colonoscopy. Thirty-one (35%) of the subjects having a colonoscopy were women and 57 (65%) were men. Fifty-five true adenomas were found in 46 subjects. All together, six subjects had proximal adenomas. Five adenocarcinomas were diagnosed, all within the reach of the sigmoidoscope.
CONCLUSIONS: The compliance was lower and the adenomas were fewer than expected. To increase compliance it is necessary with rigorously controlled invitation routines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477473     DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  Low folate levels may protect against colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B Van Guelpen; J Hultdin; I Johansson; G Hallmans; R Stenling; E Riboli; A Winkvist; R Palmqvist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  History of negative colorectal endoscopy and risk of rectosigmoid neoplasms at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Luigina Bonelli; Stefania Sciallero; Carlo Senore; Marco Zappa; Hugo Aste; Bruno Andreoni; Donato Angioli; Roberto Ferraris; Stefano Gasperoni; Giuseppe Malfitana; Marco Pennazio; Wendy Atkin; Nereo Segnan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.

Authors:  Grace Hui-Min Wu; Yi-Ming Wang; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Jau-Min Wong; Hsin-Chih Lai; Jane Warwick; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Comorbid Illness, Bowel Preparation, and Logistical Constraints Are Key Reasons for Outpatient Colonoscopy Nonattendance.

Authors:  Deepti Chopra; Lawrence C Hookey
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-11

5.  Appointments timed in proximity to annual milestones and compliance with screening: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.