Literature DB >> 15862217

Coherence between fMRI time-series distinguishes two spatial working memory networks.

Clayton E Curtis1, Felice T Sun, Lee M Miller, Mark D'Esposito.   

Abstract

Widespread and distributed brain regions are thought to form networks that together support working memory. We recently demonstrated that different cortical areas maintain relatively different codes across a memory delay (Curtis et. al., J Neurosci, 2004; 24:3944-3952). The frontal eye fields (FEF), for example, were more active during the delay when the direction of the memory-guided saccade was known compared to when it was not known throughout the delay. Other areas showed the opposite pattern. Despite these task-dependent differences in regional activity, we could only assume but not address the functional interactions between the identified nodes of the putative network. Here, we use a bivariate technique, coherence, to formally characterize functional interactions between a seed region and other brain areas. We find that the type of representational codes that are being maintained in working memory biases frontal-parietal interactions. For example, coherence between FEF and other oculomotor areas was greater when a motor representation was an efficient strategy to bridge the delay period. However, coherence between the FEF and higher-order heteromodal areas, e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, was greater when a sensory representation must be maintained in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15862217     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  Linking Functional Connectivity and Structural Connectivity Quantitatively: A Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Haiqing Huang; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-01-07

2.  Exploring resting-state functional connectivity with total interdependence.

Authors:  Xiaotong Wen; Jue Mo; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  BOLD coherence reveals segregated functional neural interactions when adapting to distinct torque perturbations.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Paul J Schmitt; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Circuitry underlying temporally extended spatial working memory.

Authors:  Charles F Geier; Krista E Garver; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Delayed match to object or place: an event-related fMRI study of short-term stimulus maintenance and the role of stimulus pre-exposure.

Authors:  Karin Schon; Sule Tinaz; David C Somers; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Cognit activation: a mechanism enabling temporal integration in working memory.

Authors:  Joaquín M Fuster; Steven L Bressler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Spatio-Spectral Mixed Effects Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Hakmook Kang; Hernando Ombao; Crystal Linkletter; Nicole Long; David Badre
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  The effects of stimulant medication on working memory functional connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Christina G Wong; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  A comparison of Granger causality and coherency in fMRI-based analysis of the motor system.

Authors:  Andrew S Kayser; Felice T Sun; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.