Literature DB >> 15858626

Personal digital assistant-based drug information sources: potential to improve medication safety.

Kimberly A Galt1, Ann M Rule, Bruce Houghton, Daniel O Young, Gina Remington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the potential for personal digital assistant (PDA)-based drug information sources to minimize potential medication errors dependent on accurate and complete drug information at the point of care.
METHODS: A quality and safety framework for drug information resources was developed to evaluate 11 PDA-based drug information sources. Three drug information sources met the criteria of the framework: Eprocrates Rx Pro, Lexi-Drugs, and mobileMICROMEDEX. Medication error types related to drug information at the point of care were then determined. Forty-seven questions were developed to test the potential of the sources to prevent these error types. Pharmacists and physician experts from Creighton University created these questions based on the most common types of questions asked by primary care providers. Three physicians evaluated the drug information sources, rating the source for each question: 1=no information available, 2=some information available, or 3 = adequate amount of information available.
RESULTS: The mean ratings for the drug information sources were: 2.0 (Eprocrates Rx Pro), 2.5 (Lexi-Drugs), and 2.03 (mobileMICROMEDEX). Lexi-Drugs was significantly better (mobileMICROMEDEX t test; P=0.05; Eprocrates Rx Pro t test; P=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Lexi-Drugs was found to be the most specific and complete PDA resource available to optimize medication safety by reducing potential errors associated with drug information. No resource was sufficient to address the patient safety information needs for all cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15858626      PMCID: PMC1082940     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  8 in total

1.  A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study.

Authors:  J W Ely; J A Osheroff; P N Gorman; M H Ebell; M L Chambliss; E A Pifer; P Z Stavri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

2.  Drug-information software for Palm operating system personal digital assistants: breadth, clinical dependability, and ease of use.

Authors:  Shelly J Enders; Jason M Enders; Sheldon G Holstad
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  How to prevent eye medication errors.

Authors:  M R Cohen; N M Davis
Journal:  Am Pharm       Date:  1992-08

4.  The determinants of physician attitudes and subjective norms toward drug information sources: modification and test of the theory of reasoned action.

Authors:  C A Gaither; R P Bagozzi; F J Ascione; D M Kirking
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Mark H Ebell; M Lee Chambliss; Daniel C Vinson; James J Stevermer; Eric A Pifer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

6.  Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care.

Authors:  J W Ely; J A Osheroff; M H Ebell; G R Bergus; B T Levy; M L Chambliss; E R Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

Review 7.  Nature of preventable adverse drug events in hospitals: a literature review.

Authors:  Penkarn Kanjanarat; Almut G Winterstein; Thomas E Johns; Randy C Hatton; Ricardo Gonzalez-Rothi; Richard Segal
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 2.637

8.  Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions.

Authors:  Robert Barrons
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Quality and usability of common drug information databases.

Authors:  Carmen M Mountford; Teresa Lee; Jane de Lemos; Peter S Loewen
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2010-03

2.  Evaluation of popular drug information resources on clinically useful and actionable pharmacogenomic information.

Authors:  Jennifer S Chang; Duyen-Anh Pham; Maithao T Dang; Yiting Lu; Sheri VanOsdol; Jaekyu Shin
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-01

Review 3.  Quality of drug information database research for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Dorie W Hoody; Cynthia F Beckett; Christopher Zielenski; Gina D Moore
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-08

4.  Use and perceived benefits of mobile devices by physicians in preventing adverse drug events in the nursing home.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Richard D Boyce; Frank M Ligons; Subashan Perera; David A Nace; Harry Hochheiser
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  Survey of Drug Information Database Preferences among Staff from Selected British Columbia Health Authorities.

Authors:  Yiu-Ching Jennifer Wong; Candy Lee; Adil Virani
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-10-01

6.  The characteristics of drug information inquiries in an Ethiopian university hospital: A two-year observational study.

Authors:  Yonas Getaye Tefera; Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie; Asnakew Achaw Ayele; Yared Belete Belay; Yohannes Kelifa Emiru
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review.

Authors:  Anna M Lindquist; Pauline E Johansson; Göran I Petersson; Britt-Inger Saveman; Gunilla C Nilsson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Wallace A Marsh; Hyla H Polen; Matthew J Seamon; Blanca I Ortiz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.