Literature DB >> 24094901

Use and perceived benefits of mobile devices by physicians in preventing adverse drug events in the nursing home.

Steven M Handler1, Richard D Boyce, Frank M Ligons, Subashan Perera, David A Nace, Harry Hochheiser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although mobile devices equipped with drug reference software may help prevent adverse drug events (ADEs) in the nursing home (NH) by providing medication information at the point of care, little is known about their use and perceived benefits. The goal of this study was to conduct a survey of a nationally representative sample of NH physicians to quantify the use and perceived benefits of mobile devices in preventing ADEs in the NH setting. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed physicians who attended the 2010 American Medical Directors Association Annual Symposium about their use of mobile devices, and beliefs about the effectiveness of drug reference software in preventing ADEs.
RESULTS: The overall net valid response rate was 70% (558/800) with 42% (236/558) using mobile devices to assist with prescribing in the NH. Physicians with 15 or fewer years of clinical experience were 67% more likely to be mobile device users, compared with those with more than 15 years of clinical experience (odds ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval = 1.17-2.41; P = .005). For those who used a mobile device to assist with prescribing, almost all (98%) reported performing an average of 1 or more drug look-ups per day, performed an average of 1 to 2 lookups per day for potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and most (88%) believed that drug reference software had helped to prevent at least 1 potential ADE in the preceding 4-week period.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of NH physicians who use mobile devices with drug reference software, although significant, is lower than in other clinical environments. Our results suggest that NH physicians who use mobile devices equipped with drug reference software believe they are helpful for reducing ADEs. Further research is needed to better characterize the facilitators and barriers to adoption of the technology in the NH and its precise impact on NH ADEs.
Copyright © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nursing homes; adverse drug events; drug-drug interactions; handheld computers; m-Health; mobile devices; smartphones

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094901      PMCID: PMC4351260          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  32 in total

1.  Use and perceived benefits of handheld computer-based clinical references.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rothschild; Edward Fang; Vincent Liu; Irina Litvak; Cathy Yoon; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Epidemiology of medication-related adverse events in nursing homes.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Rollin M Wright; Christine M Ruby; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support in long-term care facilities: costs and benefits to stakeholders.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Boyd Gilman; Terry S Field; Ryan Mutter; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Effect of computerized provider order entry with clinical decision support on adverse drug events in the long-term care setting.

Authors:  Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Paula Rochon; James Judge; Leslie R Harrold; Chaim M Bell; Monica Lee; Kathleen White; Jane LaPrino; Janet Erramuspe-Mainard; Martin DeFlorio; Linda Gavendo; Joann L Baril; George Reed; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Personal digital assistant use by nurse practitioners: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Sally D Stroud; Carol A Smith; Elizabeth A Erkel
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2009-01

Review 6.  The challenge of managing drug interactions in elderly people.

Authors:  Louise Mallet; Anne Spinewine; Allen Huang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones.

Authors:  Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa; Illhoi Yoo; Lincoln Sheets
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review.

Authors:  Anna M Lindquist; Pauline E Johansson; Göran I Petersson; Britt-Inger Saveman; Gunilla C Nilsson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Wallace A Marsh; Hyla H Polen; Matthew J Seamon; Blanca I Ortiz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Patrice Ngangue; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Marie Desmartis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A survey of nursing home physicians to determine laboratory monitoring adverse drug event alert preferences.

Authors:  R D Boyce; S Perera; D A Nace; C M Culley; S M Handler
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  An ontology-based, mobile-optimized system for pharmacogenomic decision support at the point-of-care.

Authors:  Jose Antonio Miñarro-Giménez; Kathrin Blagec; Richard D Boyce; Klaus-Peter Adlassnig; Matthias Samwald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mobile technologies: expectancy, usage, and acceptance of clinical staff and patients at a university medical center.

Authors:  Kristin Illiger; Markus Hupka; Ute von Jan; Daniel Wichelhaus; Urs-Vito Albrecht
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Impact of training and structured medication review on medication appropriateness and patient-related outcomes in nursing homes: results from the interventional study InTherAKT.

Authors:  Angelika Mahlknecht; Laura Krisch; Nadja Nestler; Ulrike Bauer; Nina Letz; Daniel Zenz; Jochen Schuler; Laura Fährmann; Georg Hempel; Maria Flamm; Jürgen Osterbrink
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  The expectations and acceptability of a smart nursing home model among Chinese elderly people: A mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhao; Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina; Fakhrul Zaman Rokhani; Jing Su; Boon-How Chew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of a video intervention on physicians' acceptance of pain apps: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hauke Jeldrik Hein; Julia Anna Glombiewski; Winfried Rief; Jenny Riecke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 8.  Defining the concepts of a smart nursing home and its potential technology utilities that integrate medical services and are acceptable to stakeholders: a scoping review.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhao; Fakhrul Zaman Rokhani; Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina; Navin Kumar Devaraj; Jing Su; Boon-How Chew
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.070

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.