Literature DB >> 15857073

Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.

William Becker1, Lars Sennerby, Edwin Bedrossian, Burton E Becker, Jean Pierre Lucchini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies indicate that implants placed at the time of extraction have high success rates. Implants must be stable at the time of insertion. Presently there are no data indicating the degree of implant stability when implants are placed at the time of extraction. This study evaluated changes in stability of implants from implant placement to abutment connection utilizing resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The unit of measurement was the international stability quotient (ISQ).
METHODS: Prior to treatment, patients were given medical history and dental evaluations. Periapical and panogram radiographs were taken. Fifty-two patients requiring extraction of one or two teeth and implant placement immediately after extraction were enrolled in this study. Under conscious sedation and local anesthesia or local anesthesia alone, teeth were atraumatically removed and the extraction sockets were debrided. A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible) were placed. Using a one-stage approach, all implants were placed within the patient's alveolar envelope and were never placed directly into extraction sockets. All implants were placed into contained extraction sites. Bone augmentation procedures were not performed. After implant insertion, the RFA electronic transducer was attached to the head of the implant with the retaining screw. The device was attached to a computer designed to register RFA scores in ISQ units. RFA measurements were taken at implant placement and abutment connection. Bone qualities, quantity, implant length and width as well as site of placement were recorded.
RESULTS: The average interval between implant insertion and abutment connection was 5.6 months (SD 2.05). Two implants were lost between implant insertion and 1 year. At 2 to 3 years, the cumulative survival was 97.2%. Resonance frequency measurements at implant placement showed a mean primary stability of 62.0 (SE 1.1; range 43 to 83 ISQ) and a mean secondary stability after 1 year of 64.0 (SE 1.2; range 40 to 98 ISQ) for all implants. The increase was marginally significant (generalized estimating equation z-statistic = 1.79; P value = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed at the time of extraction and inserted into native bone and not directly into extractions sockets have a high degree of initial stability as evidenced by RFA measurements. Implants with initial high ISQ levels revealed a slight drop in levels over time, while implants with levels lower than 60 had increases in levels between implant insertion and abutment connection. At 2 to 3 years the cumulative survival rate was 97.2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15857073     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  13 in total

1.  Survival of Implants in Immediate Extraction Sockets of Anterior Teeth: Early Clinical Results.

Authors:  Mohammad Sabir; Mohammad Nazish Alam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  Annette Rabel; Steffen Gerhard Köhler; Andrea Maria Schmidt-Westhausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Significance of bone morphology and quality on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants: in vitro comparison between human bone substitute and artificial bone.

Authors:  Sachin Chhatwani; Ouafaa Kouji-Diehl; Kristian Kniha; Ali Modabber; Frank Hölzle; Jozsef Szalma; Gholamreza Danesh; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Seung-Lok Lee; Hee-Jung Kim; Mee-Kyoung Son; Chae-Heon Chung
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Evaluation of implants placed immediately or delayed into extraction sites.

Authors:  U S Pal; Neeraj Kumar Dhiman; Geeta Singh; R K Singh; Shadab Mohammad; Laxman R Malkunje
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

6.  Evaluation of stability changes in tapered and parallel wall implants: a human clinical trial.

Authors:  Ar Rokn; Aar Rasouli Ghahroudi; A Mesgarzadeh; Aa Miremadi; S Yaghoobi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-12-20

7.  In vitro evaluation of resonance frequency analysis values to different implant contact ratio and stiffness of surrounding material.

Authors:  Mu-Seung Kwak; Seok-Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Immediate placement of single implant simultaneously with immediate loading in a fresh socket associated to periapical infection: A clinical case report.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Blanca Serra-Pastor; Cesar Chust-López; Antonio Fons-Font; Alberto Ferreiroa
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-02-01

9.  Increased crown-to-implant ratio may not be a risk factor for dental implant failure under appropriate plaque control.

Authors:  Shinsuke Okada; Katsunori Koretake; Yasunari Miyamoto; Hiroshi Oue; Yasumasa Akagawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Immediate 3-dimensional ridge augmentation after extraction of periodontally hopeless tooth using chinblock graft.

Authors:  Ankit Desai; Raison Thomas; Tarunkumar A Baron; Rucha Shah; Dhoom-Singh Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.