Literature DB >> 15854821

Microfluidic immunosensor systems.

Adam Bange1, H Brian Halsall, William R Heineman.   

Abstract

Immunosensing microfluidic devices are reviewed. Devices are commonly fabricated in glass, silicon, and polymers, with polymers seeing greater attention in recent years. Methods have been developed to immobilize antibodies and other molecules and resist non-specific adsorption through surface modification. The most common detection method is fluorescence, followed by electrochemistry. Various microfluidic designs have been reported for immunoassay applications. The observed trends in microfluidic immunoassay applications closely resemble the trends of general immunoassays, where large molecules are detected principally through a sandwich procedure, while competitive assays are used to detect smaller molecules. The following future trends are suggested: more sensitive detection, increased integration and miniaturization, multianalyte analysis, more robust reagents and devices, and increased functionality of surface treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15854821     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  78 in total

1.  Microfluidic electrochemical immunoarray for ultrasensitive detection of two cancer biomarker proteins in serum.

Authors:  Bhaskara V Chikkaveeraiah; Vigneshwaran Mani; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind; James F Rusling
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 2.  Measurement of biomarker proteins for point-of-care early detection and monitoring of cancer.

Authors:  James F Rusling; Challa V Kumar; J Silvio Gutkind; Vyomesh Patel
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 3.  Nanomaterials-based electrochemical immunosensors for proteins.

Authors:  James F Rusling
Journal:  Chem Rec       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.771

4.  SlipChip for immunoassays in nanoliter volumes.

Authors:  Weishan Liu; Delai Chen; Wenbin Du; Kevin P Nichols; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  On-chip titration of an anticoagulant argatroban and determination of the clotting time within whole blood or plasma using a plug-based microfluidic system.

Authors:  Helen Song; Hung-Wing Li; Matthew S Munson; Thuong G Van Ha; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Microwave-triggered metal-enhanced chemiluminescence (MT-MEC): application to ultra-fast and ultra-sensitive clinical assays.

Authors:  Michael J R Previte; Kadir Aslan; Stuart Malyn; Chris D Geddes
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence (MAMEF): application to ultra fast and sensitive clinical assays.

Authors:  Kadir Aslan; Chris D Geddes
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 8.  Opportunities for microfluidic technologies in synthetic biology.

Authors:  Shelly Gulati; Vincent Rouilly; Xize Niu; James Chappell; Richard I Kitney; Joshua B Edel; Paul S Freemont; Andrew J deMello
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Protein immobilization techniques for microfluidic assays.

Authors:  Dohyun Kim; Amy E Herr
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Shadow masking for nanomaterial-based biosensors incorporated with a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Jiyong Huang; Innam Lee; Xiliang Luo; Xinyan Tracy Cui; Minhee Yun
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.