Literature DB >> 15854630

Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.

Sidney Funk1, Michael M Miller, Daniel R Mishell, David F Archer, Alfred Poindexter, Juergen Schmidt, Edio Zampaglione.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel (Implanontrade mark) were investigated in a multicenter clinical trial. STUDY
DESIGN: Sexually active American women (N=330) with apparently normal menstrual cycles used the implant for up to 2 years. All subjects recorded bleeding and/or spotting daily in a diary. Safety was assessed through adverse experiences (AEs), laboratory tests and physical and gynecologic examinations.
RESULTS: Total exposure was 474 woman-years (6186 cycles), and 68% of subjects had at least 1 year of exposure. No pregnancies occurred. The most common bleeding pattern observed throughout the study was infrequent bleeding, defined as less than three episodes of bleeding in a reference period (excluding amenorrhea). The least common pattern was frequent bleeding, defined as more than five episodes of bleeding in a reference period. Infrequent, prolonged and frequent bleeding patterns were most common early in the study and declined thereafter. During the 3-month Reference Periods 2-8 (Months 4-24), the incidence of amenorrhea ranged from 14% to 20%. Forty-three subjects (13%) withdrew from the study because of bleeding pattern changes and 76 subjects (23%) discontinued because of other AEs. Other common AEs leading to discontinuation, besides bleeding irregularities, were emotional lability (6.1%), weight increase (3.3%), depression (2.4%) and acne (1.5%). Use of Implanon (etonogestrel subdermal implant, referred to herein as ENG implant) for up to 2 years had no clinically significant effects on laboratory parameters, physical and pelvic examinations, vital signs or body mass index. The average length of time required for ENG implant insertion and that for removal were 0.5 and 3.5 min, respectively, and all the procedures were uncomplicated. The return to normal menstrual cycles and fertility was rapid after removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Implanon is a safe, highly effective and rapidly reversible new method of contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15854630     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  27 in total

1.  Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Christian J Thaler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Pseudotumor Cerebri and Implanon: Is Rapid Weight Gain the Trigger?

Authors:  Nirusha Kassen; Cait-Lynn Wells; Anand Moodley
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-11-09

Review 3.  Contraception in women with medical problems.

Authors:  Mandish K Dhanjal
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 4.  Hormonal Contraceptives and Dermatology.

Authors:  Natalie M Williams; Michael Randolph; Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi; Jonette Keri; Antonella Tosti
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Amy Stoddard; Colleen McNicholas; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Simultaneous determination of etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS and its pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Sneha G Nair; Daxesh P Patel; Frank J Gonzalez; Bhargav M Patel; Puran Singhal; Darshan V Chaudhary
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 7.  Safety and efficacy of contraception--Why should the obese woman be any different?

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Alison B Edelman
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; Sanyukta Desai; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Contraception for adolescents with lupus.

Authors:  Melissa S Tesher; Amy Whitaker; Melissa Gilliam; Linda Wagner-Weiner; Karen B Onel
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.054

10.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.

Authors:  Heather Hohmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.