Literature DB >> 1584944

Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients.

C W Heron1, P T Calvert.   

Abstract

To compare the findings on magnetic resonance (MR) images of the knee obtained with a three-dimensional gradient-echo (GRE) sequence with findings at arthroscopy, the menisci, cruciate ligaments, and hyaline cartilage were assessed in 100 patients. At MR imaging (performed by means of fast imaging with steady-state precession) and arthroscopy, the menisci (n = 200) and areas of hyaline cartilage (n = 500) were assigned grades of zero (normal) to three (greatest abnormality). The cruciate ligaments were considered intact, partially torn, or completely torn. The sensitivity of MR imaging in diagnosis of meniscal tears seen at arthroscopy was 97% and the specificity, 94%. For complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament, the sensitivity was 92% and specificity, 96%. In the posterior cruciate ligament, both the sensitivity and specificity were 100%. Good correlation existed between findings at MR imaging and those at arthroscopy in assessment of focal thinning and full-thickness loss of hyaline cartilage, but arthroscopy enabled superior visualization of minor fissuring. Three-dimensional GRE MR imaging enables accurate assessment of the articular cartilage of the knee. The evaluation of meniscal tears and the cruciate ligaments has a high negative predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584944     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  30 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  W D Prickett; S I Ward; M J Matava
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Bone scintigraphy in chronic knee pain: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; J Dahlström; H Dirksen; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Eugene G McNally
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  C W Heron
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Benjamin T Drew; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Correlation of intra-articular osseous measurements with posterior cruciate ligament length on MRI scans.

Authors:  S H Orakzai; C M Egan; S Eustace; P Kenny; S J O'flanagan; P Keogh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Impact of MRI on a knee arthroscopy waiting list.

Authors:  R L Williams; L A Williams; R Watura; J A Fairclough
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Optimizing joint imaging: MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Adam; M Drobnitzky; C C Nolte-Ernsting; R W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of patellar cartilage lesions: a prospective study.

Authors:  J A Vallotton; R A Meuli; P F Leyvraz; M Landry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.