Literature DB >> 12130591

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Eugene G McNally.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12130591      PMCID： PMC1123655          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  The impact of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee on surgical decision making.

Authors:  H W Trieshmann; J C Mosure
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Accuracy of MRI patterns in evaluating anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  K P Barry; M Mesgarzadeh; J Triolo; R Moyer; J Tehranzadeh; A Bonakdarpour
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  MRI can prevent unnecessary arthroscopy.

Authors:  I W Carmichael; A M MacLeod; J Travlos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

4.  Economic considerations for the diagnosis and therapy of meniscal lesions: can magnetic resonance imaging help reduce the expense?

Authors:  R Weinstabl; T Muellner; V Vécsei; F Kainberger; M Kramer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients.

Authors:  C W Heron; P T Calvert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on a knee arthroscopy waiting list.

Authors:  D J Warwick; P Cavanagh; M Bell; C H Marsh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; A K Dixon; G S Keene; W Hollingworth; D J Lomas; R N Villar
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  MR diagnosis of complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: importance of anterior subluxation of the tibia.

Authors:  W P Chan; C Peterfy; R C Fritz; H K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  MR imaging of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee.

Authors:  Y Araki; H Tanaka; H Yamamoto; T Yamamoto; K Shino; H Nakamura; I Tsukaguchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Imaging of bone tumors.

Authors:  A M Davies; R M Wellings
Journal:  Curr Opin Radiol       Date:  1992
View more
  6 in total

1.  Value of knee imaging by GPs requires rigorous assessment.

Authors:  Stephen Brealey; Ian Russell; Fiona Gilbert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-23

2.  Accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging in meniscal and ligamentous injuries of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy.

Authors:  Noha H Behairy; Mohsen A Dorgham; Sherif A Khaled
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The iliotibial band in acute knee trauma: patterns of injury on MR imaging.

Authors:  Ramy Mansour; Philip Yoong; David McKean; James L Teh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The popliteal fibular ligament in acute knee trauma: patterns of injury on MR imaging.

Authors:  D McKean; P Yoong; S Yanny; E Thomee; D Grant; J L Teh; R Mansour
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Use of knee magnetic resonance imaging by primary care physicians in patients aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  David J Petron; Patrick E Greis; Stephen K Aoki; Stuart Black; Derek Krete; Kinjal B Sohagia; Robert Burks
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Manual khalifa therapy improves functional and morphological outcome of patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the knee: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Ofner; Andreas Kastner; Engelbert Wallenboeck; Robert Pehn; Frank Schneider; Reinhard Groell; Dieter Szolar; Harald Walach; Gerhard Litscher; Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.629
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.