M K Torstveit1, J Sundgot-Borgen. 1. The Norwegian University of Sport and Physical Education, PO Box 4014, Ullevaal Stadion, 0806 Oslo, Norway. monica.torstveit@nih.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare bone mineral density (BMD), investigate factors associated with BMD, and examine the prevalence of low BMD in athletes and non-athletic controls. METHODS: The study included a questionnaire (part I), measurement of BMD (part II), and a clinical interview (part III). All Norwegian female athletes on national teams (n = 938) and an aged matched random sample of non-athletic controls (n = 900) were invited to participate. The questionnaire was completed by 88% of athletes and 70% of controls. A random sample of these athletes (n = 300) and controls (n = 300) was invited to participate in parts II and III. All parts were completed by 186 athletes (62%) and 145 controls (48%). RESULTS:Mean (standard deviation) total body (TB) BMD was higher (p<0.001) in athletes (1.21 (0.09) g/cm2) than in controls (1.18 (0.08) g/cm2), and higher (p<0.001) in high impact (HI) sports athletes than in medium impact (MI) and low impact (LI) sports athletes. In athletes, body weight and impact loading sports were positively associated, and percent body fat and eating disorders were negatively associated with TB BMD. Body weight and weight bearing activities were positively associated and menstrual dysfunction was negatively associated with TB BMD in controls. A higher percentage of controls (28.3%) than athletes (10.7%) had low BMD (p<0.001). CONCLUSION:Female elite athletes have 3-20% higher BMD than non-athletic controls and HI sports athletes have 3-22% higher BMD compared with MI and LI sports athletes. Low BMD is two to three times more common in non-athletic premenopausal women than in elite athletes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare bone mineral density (BMD), investigate factors associated with BMD, and examine the prevalence of low BMD in athletes and non-athletic controls. METHODS: The study included a questionnaire (part I), measurement of BMD (part II), and a clinical interview (part III). All Norwegian female athletes on national teams (n = 938) and an aged matched random sample of non-athletic controls (n = 900) were invited to participate. The questionnaire was completed by 88% of athletes and 70% of controls. A random sample of these athletes (n = 300) and controls (n = 300) was invited to participate in parts II and III. All parts were completed by 186 athletes (62%) and 145 controls (48%). RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) total body (TB) BMD was higher (p<0.001) in athletes (1.21 (0.09) g/cm2) than in controls (1.18 (0.08) g/cm2), and higher (p<0.001) in high impact (HI) sports athletes than in medium impact (MI) and low impact (LI) sports athletes. In athletes, body weight and impact loading sports were positively associated, and percent body fat and eating disorders were negatively associated with TB BMD. Body weight and weight bearing activities were positively associated and menstrual dysfunction was negatively associated with TB BMD in controls. A higher percentage of controls (28.3%) than athletes (10.7%) had low BMD (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Female elite athletes have 3-20% higher BMD than non-athletic controls and HI sports athletes have 3-22% higher BMD compared with MI and LI sports athletes. Low BMD is two to three times more common in non-athletic premenopausal women than in elite athletes.
Authors: Craig S Duncan; Cameron J R Blimkie; Christopher T Cowell; Stephen T Burke; Julie N Briody; Robert Howman-Giles Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts Journal: CMAJ Date: 2002-11-12 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Barbara S McClanahan; Karen Harmon-Clayton; Kenneth D Ward; Robert C Klesges; Christopher M Vukadinovich; Edwin D Cantler Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Kristin L Cobb; Laura K Bachrach; Gail Greendale; Robert Marcus; Robert M Neer; Jeri Nieves; Mary Fran Sowers; Byron W Brown; Geetha Gopalakrishnan; Crystal Luetters; Heather K Tanner; Bridget Ward; Jennifer L Kelsey Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jason M Nagata; Jennifer L Carlson; Neville H Golden; Stuart B Murray; Jin Long; Mary B Leonard; Rebecka Peebles Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: D C Wilks; K Winwood; S F Gilliver; A Kwiet; M Chatfield; I Michaelis; L W Sun; J L Ferretti; A J Sargeant; D Felsenberg; J Rittweger Journal: Bone Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 4.398