A Honda1, M Matsumoto, T Kato, Y Umemura. 1. Laboratory for Exercise Physiology and Biomechanics, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, 101 Tokodachi, Kaizu-cho, Toyota, 470-0393, Aichi, Japan, a.hond0920@gmail.com.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The associations between mid-femoral cross-sectional geometry and exercise characteristics were investigated in female athletes. The effects on bone geometry for weight-bearing sports with low-to-high-impact were greater than those for non-impact weight-bearing sports, whereas low-impact or high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate sports had less of an effect on bone geometry compared with higher-impact sports. INTRODUCTION: Many previous studies have investigated tibial geometry in athletes; however, few studies have examined the associations between femoral cross-sectional geometry and exercise characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate these relationships using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the femoral mid-shaft. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three female elite athletes, aged 18-34 years, were classified into five groups based on the characteristics of their sports. Sports were considered non-impact (n = 27), low- or moderate-impact (n = 39), odd-impact (n = 38), high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate (n = 10), or high-impact (n = 39). Bone geometrical parameters, including cortical area, periosteal perimeter, and moment of inertia (bone strength index), were determined using MRI images. RESULTS: Higher-impact groups displayed bone expansion, with significantly greater periosteal perimeters, cortical areas (~37.3%), and minimum moments of inertia (I(min,) ~92.3%) at the mid-femur than non- and low-impact groups. After adjusting for age, height, and weight, the cortical area and I(min) of the low-impact and high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate groups were also significantly greater than those of the non-impact group. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-impact sports with high strain rates stimulated periosteal bone formation and improved bone geometry and strength indices at the femoral mid-shaft. Although our results indicate that weight-bearing sports are beneficial even if they are low impact, the effects of lower-impact or high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate sports on bone geometry were less pronounced than the effects of higher-impact sports at the femoral mid-shaft.
UNLABELLED: The associations between mid-femoral cross-sectional geometry and exercise characteristics were investigated in female athletes. The effects on bone geometry for weight-bearing sports with low-to-high-impact were greater than those for non-impact weight-bearing sports, whereas low-impact or high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate sports had less of an effect on bone geometry compared with higher-impact sports. INTRODUCTION: Many previous studies have investigated tibial geometry in athletes; however, few studies have examined the associations between femoral cross-sectional geometry and exercise characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate these relationships using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the femoral mid-shaft. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three female elite athletes, aged 18-34 years, were classified into five groups based on the characteristics of their sports. Sports were considered non-impact (n = 27), low- or moderate-impact (n = 39), odd-impact (n = 38), high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate (n = 10), or high-impact (n = 39). Bone geometrical parameters, including cortical area, periosteal perimeter, and moment of inertia (bone strength index), were determined using MRI images. RESULTS: Higher-impact groups displayed bone expansion, with significantly greater periosteal perimeters, cortical areas (~37.3%), and minimum moments of inertia (I(min,) ~92.3%) at the mid-femur than non- and low-impact groups. After adjusting for age, height, and weight, the cortical area and I(min) of the low-impact and high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate groups were also significantly greater than those of the non-impact group. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-impact sports with high strain rates stimulated periosteal bone formation and improved bone geometry and strength indices at the femoral mid-shaft. Although our results indicate that weight-bearing sports are beneficial even if they are low impact, the effects of lower-impact or high-strain-magnitude/low-strain-rate sports on bone geometry were less pronounced than the effects of higher-impact sports at the femoral mid-shaft.
Authors: Marta C Erlandson; Saija A Kontulainen; Phil D Chilibeck; Cathy M Arnold; Robert A Faulkner; Adam D G Baxter-Jones Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ornólfur Valdimarsson; Henrik G Alborg; Henrik Düppe; Fredrik Nyquist; Magnus Karlsson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Gotzone Hervás; Fatima Ruiz-Litago; Jon Irazusta; Amaia Irazusta; Begoña Sanz; Javier Gil-Goikouria; Ana Belen Fraile-Bermudez; Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo; Idoia Zarrazquin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.390