Literature DB >> 15846523

Experience in the use of the palliative care outcome scale.

A-M Stevens1, B Gwilliam, R A'hern, K Broadley, J Hardy.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: The objective of the study is to assess the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) as a potential audit tool within a specialist cancer centre. It also aims to answer the following questions: does the tool identify problem areas and demonstrate changes in quality of life over time? How well do staff and patient ratings correlate? PATIENTS AND METHODS: The POS questionnaire was piloted at a specialist cancer centre. Thirty consecutive patients admitted to the palliative care wards and ward staff completed questionnaires on admission and twice weekly until discharge or death. A further questionnaire assessed staff attitudes.
RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in overall patient POS score at 1 week (days 5-9). Four "symptoms" or issues were scored as being important for our patients: pain, other symptoms, anxiety and patient's perception of family anxiety. These all significantly improved within the first week. At the initial assessment, staff underestimated patients' pain and overestimated problems relating to information giving and patients' ability to share their feelings. There was no significant difference between staff and patient scores after 1 week. The other six areas covered by the tool were less important; this may reflect the patient population seen at our centre. Use of the tool identified areas for staff training and effectively demonstrated improvement in patient care.
CONCLUSION: The POS is an outcome measure tool designed to assess physical, psychological, practical and existential aspects of quality of life. It may be useful in identifying problems in individual patients and directing care to address these needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15846523     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0815-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  8 in total

1.  The use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in palliative care.

Authors:  J R Hardy; P Edmonds; R Turner; E Rees; R A'Hern
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study.

Authors:  Harvey Max Chochinov; Thomas Hack; Thomas Hassard; Linda J Kristjanson; Susan McClement; Mike Harlos
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  J Hearn; I J Higginson
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-06

4.  The use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within a palliative care unit in the UK.

Authors:  E Rees; J Hardy; J Ling; K Broadley; R A'Hern
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group.

Authors:  J Hearn; I J Higginson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

6.  Terminal illness: views of patients and their lay carers.

Authors:  D Field; C Douglas; C Jagger; P Dand
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?

Authors:  I J Higginson; M McCarthy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

Authors:  M L Slevin; H Plant; D Lynch; J Drinkwater; W M Gregory
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The influence of age on the likelihood of receiving end-of-life care consistent with patient treatment preferences.

Authors:  John D Parr; Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Alexi Wright; Tracy Balboni; Edmund Duthie; Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Perceptions of anxiety in lung cancer patients and their support network.

Authors:  D Buchanan; R Milroy; L Baker; A M Thompson; P A Levack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Measuring Neurobehavioral Functioning in People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Rasch Analysis of Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory.

Authors:  Karol J Czuba; Paula Kersten; Nicola M Kayes; Greta A Smith; Suzanne Barker-Collo; William J Taylor; Kathryn M McPherson
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

4.  Translation and cultural adaptation of IPOS (integrated palliative care outcome scale) in Estonia.

Authors:  Merli Laissaar; Riina Hallik; Pille Sillaste; Ulvi Ragun; Mari-Leen Pärn; Kaiu Suija
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care in Africa: the APCA African Palliative Outcome Scale.

Authors:  Richard Harding; Lucy Selman; Godfrey Agupio; Natalya Dinat; Julia Downing; Liz Gwyther; Thandi Mashao; Keletso Mmoledi; Tony Moll; Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira; Barbara Panjatovic; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program?

Authors:  Gianluca Catania; Massimo Costantini; Monica Beccaro; Annamaria Bagnasco; Loredana Sasso
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Wei Gao
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.