Literature DB >> 15844733

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing a starting dose of 100 IU or 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF treatment.

Seang Lin Tan1, Timothy J Child, Anthony P Cheung, Margo R Fluker, Albert Yuzpe, Robert Casper, Peter Leung, Kenneth Cadesky, Victoria J Davis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency and efficacy of two starting doses of recombinant FSH (follitropin-beta, Puregon) in women undergoing IVF treatment.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentric (N = 6) study included 192 women undergoing IVF using the long protocol of GnRH agonist who received either 100 IU or 200 IU of r-FSH per day. Gonadotropin dose adjustment was allowed after day 4 of stimulation.
RESULTS: The average (SD) number of oocytes retrieved was 10.9 (5.4) and 12.2 (5.6) in the 100 IU and 200 IU group respectively (p = 0.067). The total doses of Puregon administered were 1887 IU and 2559 IU in the 100 IU and 200 IU group respectively. The number of transferable embryos, and the rates of pregnancies, cancelled cycles, miscarriages and adverse events including OHSS were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing IVF have similar outcomes whether recombinant FSH is commenced in a dose of 100 IU or 200 IU for the first 4 days of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844733      PMCID: PMC3455475          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-1497-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  21 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial using fixed daily doses of 100 or 200 IU of recombinant FSH in ICSI cycles.

Authors:  H J Out; I David; R Ron-El; S Friedler; E Shalev; J Geslevich; J Dor; A Shulman; Z Ben-Rafael; B Fisch; M Dirnfeld
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of two recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone preparations in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  P Brinsden; F Akagbosu; L M Gibbons; S Lancaster; D Gourdon; P Engrand; E Loumaye
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists.

Authors:  R Frydman; C M Howles; F Truong
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  H J Out; D D Braat; B M Lintsen; T Gurgan; O Bukulmez; O Gökmen; G Keles; P Caballero; J M González; F Fábregues; J Balasch; R Roulier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Prognostic factors in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  H Tinkanen; M Bläuer; P Laippala; P Tuohimaa; E Kujansuu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Ovarian stimulation during assisted reproduction treatment: a comparison of recombinant and highly purified urinary human FSH. On behalf of The Feronia and Apis study group.

Authors:  R Schats; P D Sutter; S Bassil; J A Kremer; H Tournaye; J Donnez
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an IVF programme.

Authors:  E H Ng; O S Tang; P C Ho
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of differing starter doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin-beta) for first time in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles.

Authors:  R F Harrison; S Jacob; H Spillane; E Mallon; B Hennelly
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A controlled study comparing patients with and without polycystic ovaries undergoing in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  M J MacDougall; S L Tan; A Balen; H S Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  R T Scott; J P Toner; S J Muasher; S Oehninger; S Robinson; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Is there a recommended maximum starting dose of FSH in IVF?

Authors:  Luk Rombauts
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Less is more: increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Lubna Pal; Sangita Jindal; Barry R Witt; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  FSH dose is negatively correlated with number of oocytes retrieved: analysis of a data set with ~650,000 ART cycles that previously identified an inverse relationship between FSH dose and live birth rate.

Authors:  Zaramasina L Clark; Mili Thakur; Richard E Leach; James J Ireland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Jack Wilkinson; Jori A Leijdekkers; Antonio La Marca; Ben Willem J Mol; Jane Marjoribanks; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

5.  Recurrent implantation failure is more frequently seen in female patients with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Pelin Ocal; Tayfur Cift; Berk Bulut; Eray Balcan; Ismail Cepni; Begum Aydogan; Tulay Irez
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-19

6.  Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrija Kumar Datta; Abha Maheshwari; Nirmal Felix; Stuart Campbell; Geeta Nargund
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Alfa Dose Adjustment in US Clinical Practice: An Observational, Retrospective Analysis of a Real-World Electronic Medical Records Database.

Authors:  Mary C Mahony; Brooke Hayward; Gilbert L Mottla; Kevin S Richter; Stephanie Beall; G David Ball; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.