Literature DB >> 10686190

A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists.

R Frydman1, C M Howles, F Truong.   

Abstract

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F((R))) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP; Metrodin((R)) HP) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A total of 278 patients began a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol, then 139 received r-hFSH and 139 u-hFSH HP, 150 IU/day administered s.c., for the first 6 days of treatment. On day 7, the dose was adjusted, if necessary, according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, 10 000 IU, s.c.) was administered once there was more than one follicle 18 mm in diameter and two others >/=16 mm. Oocyte retrieval was performed 36-38 h after HCG injection: 128 patients (92%) receiving r-hFSH and 113 (81%) receiving u-hFSH HP had at least one oocyte retrieved. Among patients receiving r-hFSH, there was a significantly higher mean (+/- SD) number of oocytes retrieved (11.0 +/- 5.9 versus 8.8 +/- 4.8 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0. 002) and mean number of embryos obtained (5.1 +/- 3.7 versus 3.5 +/- 2.9 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0.0001). With r-hFSH, significantly fewer FSH treatment days (11.7 +/- 1.9 versus 14.5 +/- 3.3) and 75 IU ampoules (27.6 +/- 10.2 versus 40.7 +/- 13.6) were required than with u-hFSH HP (P = 0.0001). Embryo replacement on day 2-3 after oocyte retrieval resulted in 36 liveborn children in the Gonal-F((R)) group and 33 in the Metrodin HP((R)) group (not significant). There were seven cases (5.0%) of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the r-hFSH group and three (2.2%), in the u-hFSH HP group (not significant). It is concluded that r-hFSH is more effective than u-hFSH in inducing multiple follicular development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10686190     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  18 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction techniques in the Spanish public health care system.

Authors:  Alberto Romeu; Juan Balasch; José A Ruiz Balda; Pedro N Barri; Salim Daya; Jean P Auray; Gerald Duru; Ariel Beresniak; José A Peinado
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing a starting dose of 100 IU or 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF treatment.

Authors:  Seang Lin Tan; Timothy J Child; Anthony P Cheung; Margo R Fluker; Albert Yuzpe; Robert Casper; Peter Leung; Kenneth Cadesky; Victoria J Davis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Differential gene expression in human granulosa cells from recombinant FSH versus human menopausal gonadotropin ovarian stimulation protocols.

Authors:  John Brannian; Kathleen Eyster; Breanne A Mueller; Mandi G Bietz; Keith Hansen
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 4.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Joan C Schertz; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Individualised controlled ovarian stimulation (iCOS): maximising success rates for assisted reproductive technology patients.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Recombinant versus highly-purified, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized study with cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Francesca Poso; Gianluca Gennarelli; Federica Moffa; Giuseppina Grassi; Marco Massobrio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Comparison of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (rhFSH), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) on semen parameters after varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Amirzargar; Mahnaz Yavangi; Abbass Basiri; Sayyed Mahdi Hosseini Moghaddam; Hooshang Babbolhavaeji; Nasibeh Amirzargar; Hossein Amirzargar; Leila Moadabshoar
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2012-09

8.  Safety and efficacy of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) for up to 3 cycles in infertile women using assisted reproductive technology: a phase 3 open-label follow-up to Main Study.

Authors:  Thomas Strowitzki; Waldemar Kuczynski; Arnd Mueller; Peter Bias
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Randomized, active-controlled, comparative phase 3 efficacy and safety equivalence trial of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) in infertile women using assisted reproduction technology (ART).

Authors:  Thomas Strowitzki; Waldemar Kuczynski; Arnd Mueller; Peter Bias
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Christos A Venetis; Human M Fatemi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Robert Fischer; Yulia Koloda; Marcos Horton; Michael Grynberg; Salvatore Longobardi; Sandro C Esteves; Sesh K Sunkara; Yuan Li; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.