Literature DB >> 15842431

The value of magnetocardiography in the course of coronary intervention.

Birgit Hailer1, Peter Van Leeuwen, Illja Chaikovsky, Sabine Auth-Eisernitz, Harald Schäfer, Dietrich Grönemeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive detection of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a clinical challenge. Previous studies have shown that magnetocardiograms reveal obvious changes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal electrocardiogram (ECG) at rest. HYPOTHESIS: The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of magnetocardiography (MCG) for the detection of electrophysiological changes in the course of successful PCI.
METHODS: Twelve-lead ECG and unshielded four-channel MCG (SQUID AG, Essen, Germany) were registered at nine prethoracic sites in 50 patients with CAD (62 +/- 10 years; EF = 76 +/- 11%; registration: before, 24 hours, and 1 month (n = 25) after PCI) and 57 normals (51 +/- 9 years). Current density vector (CDV) maps were reconstructed within the ST-T interval and classified from category 0 (normal) to category 4 (grossly abnormal). In both groups and at all registration times, the percentage of each category of maps was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Most CDV maps of normals were classified as category 0, 1, or 2 compared to CAD patients before PCI with most maps of category 3 and 4 (P < 0.0005). Twenty-four hours after PCI, more maps were classified as category 2 (P < 0.05) and less as category 4 (P < 0.005). One month after PCI the MCG results further improved: more maps were classified as category 1 (P < 0.05) and 2 (P < 0.005) and less maps as category 4 (P < 0.0001). The ECG remained unchanged in the course of PCI.
CONCLUSION: Unshielded four-channel MCG reveals obvious changes in the course of successful PCI on the basis of CDV map reconstruction during repolarization. The method seems to be suitable for the follow-up of patients after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15842431      PMCID: PMC6932285          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.05625.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  18 in total

1.  Magnetocardiography in coronary artery disease with a new system in an unshielded setting.

Authors:  Birgit Hailer; Illja Chaikovsky; Sabine Auth-Eisernitz; Harald Schäfer; Fritz Steinberg; Dietrich H W Grönemeyer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Altered myocardial states. The stunned and hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  R A Kloner; K Przyklenk; B Patel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-01-16       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Myocardial stunning and hibernation. The physiology behind the colloquialisms.

Authors:  E Marban
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Assessment of coronary arterial restenosis with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  W G Hundley; L D Hillis; C A Hamilton; R J Applegate; D M Herrington; G D Clarke; G A Braden; M S Thomas; R A Lange; R M Peshock; K M Link
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT.

Authors:  S Achenbach; W Moshage; K Bachmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 5,798 patients: is there a gender difference?

Authors:  Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Eldyn M Juracan; Douglas W Mahoney; Robert B McCully; Veronique L Roger; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty--anatomic and pathophysiological mechanisms. Strategies for prevention.

Authors:  P C Block
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Exercise treadmill testing is a poor predictor of anatomic restenosis after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M B Honan; J R Bengtson; D B Pryor; D S Rendall; R S Stack; T Hinohara; T N Skelton; R M Califf; M A Hlatky; D B Mark
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Repolarization pattern of body surface potential maps (BSPM) in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  O Kittnar; J Slavícek; M Vávrová; M Barna; A Dohnalová; A Málková; M Aschermann; J Humhal; J Hradec; J Král
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 10.  The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  E Braunwald; R A Kloner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Standard template of adult magnetocardiogram.

Authors:  Akihiko Kandori; Kuniomi Ogata; Tsuyoshi Miyashita; Yasushi Watanabe; Kimio Tanaka; Masahiro Murakami; Yuji Oka; Hiroshi Takaki; Syuji Hashimoto; Yuko Yamada; Kazuo Komamura; Wataru Shimizu; Shiro Kamakura; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Iwao Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Unshielded magnetocardiography: Repeatability and reproducibility of automatically estimated ventricular repolarization parameters in 204 healthy subjects.

Authors:  Anna Rita Sorbo; Gianmarco Lombardi; Lara La Brocca; Gianluigi Guida; Riccardo Fenici; Donatella Brisinda
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Subtraction magnetocardiogram for detecting coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Akihiko Kandori; Kuniomi Ogata; Tsuyoshi Miyashita; Hiroshi Takaki; Hideyuki Kanzaki; Syuji Hashimoto; Wataru Shimizu; Shiro Kamakura; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Magnetocardiographic recognition of abnormal depolarization and repolarization in patients with coronary artery lesions caused by Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Wataru Tamaki; Etsuko Tsuda; Syuji Hashimoto; Tamami Toyomasa; Mikiya Fujieda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Surface current density mapping for identification of gastric slow wave propagation.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Leo K Cheng; William O Richards; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Pseudo current density maps of electrophysiological heart, nerve or brain function and their physical basis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Haberkorn; Uwe Steinhoff; Martin Burghoff; Olaf Kosch; Andreas Morguet; Hans Koch
Journal:  Biomagn Res Technol       Date:  2006-10-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.