Literature DB >> 1583942

Can patients use an automated questionnaire to define their current health status?

M F Roizen1, D Coalson, R S Hayward, J Schmittner, R A Thisted, J L Apfelbaum, C B Stocking, C K Cassel, P Pompei, D E Ford.   

Abstract

Patient management decisions rarely incorporate standardized health status assessments, since accurate and reliable measures are difficult and expensive to obtain. In prior research with various methods for obtaining health data from patients, it was found that physicians' acceptance of a method was improved if it provided an individualized printout. It was also determined that patients will readily complete a health status questionnaire on a computer when the computer does not look like a computer. Patients' acceptance was greatest when they were presented with a single line of large, pressure-sensitive buttons with which they could respond to questions about their health histories. Using such an instrument, the HealthQuiz, the current study found the same discrepancy rate (3%) between patients' responses to health questions presented on HealthQuiz and during interview as between their responses to questions asked during two separate interviews. Further, to ascertain health status, rules determined by an expert panel were applied to patients' responses to health questions presented on the HealthQuiz screen. It was found that the numerical health status derived from answers to the automated presentation of questions was similar to numerical health status derived by a physician after a patient-physician interview.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583942     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  First Step in Telehealth Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effectiveness of an Electronic Case History Form for Dysphagia.

Authors:  Cagla Kantarcigil; Georgia A Malandraki
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  Medical diagnostic decision support systems--past, present, and future: a threaded bibliography and brief commentary.

Authors:  R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparison of selection of preoperative laboratory tests: the computer vs the anaesthetist.

Authors:  J M Davies; D Pagenkopf; K Todd; B Werry; B A Finegan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Lewis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The Employee Stress and Alcohol Project: the development of a computer-based alcohol abuse prevention program for employees.

Authors:  R A Matano; K T Futa; S F Wanat; L M Mussman; C W Leung
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  Automated direct-from-patient information collection for evidence-based diabetes care.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; R S Hayward; M A Pim; J Horsman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

7.  Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

Authors:  P D Cleary; D T Reilly; S Greenfield; A G Mulley; L Wexler; F Frankel; B J McNeil
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The routine use of health-related quality of life measures in the care of patients with epilepsy: rationale and research agenda.

Authors:  A K Wagner; B G Vickrey
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Medical diagnosis as a linguistic game.

Authors:  Peter Fritz; Andreas Kleinhans; Florian Kuisle; Patricius Albu; Christine Fritz-Kuisle; Mark Dominik Alscher
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Initial pain management plans in response to severe pain indicators on oncology clinic previsit questionnaires.

Authors:  Michael S Sanatani; Maan Kattan; Dwight E Moulin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.037

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.