Literature DB >> 7867108

Comparison of selection of preoperative laboratory tests: the computer vs the anaesthetist.

J M Davies1, D Pagenkopf, K Todd, B Werry, B A Finegan.   

Abstract

HealthQuiz II (HQII) is a computerized history-taking device which can be used by patients before anaesthesia and surgery. HealthQuiz II provides a summary of symptoms, a modified ASA Classification, and a list of suggested laboratory tests. Developed at the University of Chicago, the device has not been evaluated in Canada. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative evaluation and selection of laboratory tests by a group of Canadian anaesthetists using traditional methods versus using HealthQuiz II. Twenty-seven anaesthetists from three (Western) Canadian University teaching hospitals participated in the study. The subjects were male, aged between 30-50 yr, trained in Canada and practicing in Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver. They were asked to self-evaluate and select laboratory tests and then to complete the HQII protocol, the day before a proposed mock operation. Results of this comparison showed that the ASA scores assigned by HQII were higher for 11 subjects and lower for two. Eight anaesthetists thought HQII asked questions which they omitted while five thought HQII overlooked items. Thirteen anaesthetists believed HQII would be a useful adjunct to their practice. Only ten anaesthetists requested any tests while HealthQuiz II suggested tests for 23 subjects, with an average of 1.9 tests/subject (anaesthetists) vs 5.4 tests/subject (HQII). The total cost of tests selected by anaesthetists was $272.15 in contrast with $1,513.20 for those suggested by HQII. We conclude that rationale for test selection may have contributed to the difference in number and costs of tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7867108     DOI: 10.1007/BF03020653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  Reassessment of preoperative laboratory testing has changed the test-ordering patterns of physicians.

Authors:  A Macario; M F Roizen; R A Thisted; S Kim; F K Orkin; C Phelps
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-12

Review 2.  Preoperative patient evaluation.

Authors:  M Roizen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Can patients use an automated questionnaire to define their current health status?

Authors:  M F Roizen; D Coalson; R S Hayward; J Schmittner; R A Thisted; J L Apfelbaum; C B Stocking; C K Cassel; P Pompei; D E Ford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs.

Authors:  R S Hayward; A Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Clinical practice guidelines: between science and art.

Authors:  R N Battista; M J Hodge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  A computer-assisted preanesthesia interview: value of a computer-generated summary of patient's historical information in the preanesthesia visit.

Authors:  B M Tompkins; W J Tompkins; E Loder; A F Noonan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The automated interview versus the personal interview. Do patient responses to preoperative health questions differ?

Authors:  R E Lutner; M F Roizen; C B Stocking; R A Thisted; S Kim; P C Duke; P Pompei; C K Cassel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.892

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.