Literature DB >> 1583924

Applications of health status assessment measures in clinical practice. Overview of the third conference on advances in health status assessment.

K N Lohr1.   

Abstract

To what purposes can the measurement of health status and health-related quality of life in clinical practice be put? What success might be expected from such endeavors? What obstacles lie in the way of that success? This monograph reports on the proceedings of a conference (the third in a series on advances in health status assessment) convened to address those questions. It presents two papers concerned with barriers to and benefits of health status and quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice and another two on strategies for overcoming those barriers and exploiting the benefits; also included are papers on historical forces motivating the use of these measures, one special address on ethical issues, eight presentations on empirical research in clinical settings, several panel discussions, and four methods roundtables. A broad conclusion to be drawn from the conference proceedings is that good methods and tools for health status assessment are here and are being used in many ways, but mostly for purposes other than routine patient care. Enthusiasm for fostering the diffusion of assessment instruments into practice settings is real, but so are the doubts, particularly for clinicians "in the trenches" of everyday practice, that widespread understanding and use can be achieved easily or quickly. The challenge for the field is to be aware of and sensitive to the uncertainties and misgivings of those in clinical practice, to address those apprehensions through both formal research and practical tests, and to maintain the momentum of communication and collaboration carried forward by this third conference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583924     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of responsiveness indices in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  L E Pfennings; H M van der Ploeg; L Cohen; C H Polman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Measuring the public's health.

Authors:  Stephen B Thacker; Donna F Stroup; Vilma Carande-Kulis; James S Marks; Kakoli Roy; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The determinants of CABG patients' outcomes.

Authors:  I Sahin; T T Wan; B Sahin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-12

5.  Quality of life assessment by community pharmacists: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J P Bentley; M C Smith; B F Banahan; D A Frate; B R Parks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Physicians' perspective on quality of life: an exploratory study of oncologists.

Authors:  K M Taylor; K G Macdonald; A Bezjak; P Ng; A D DePetrillo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: a review of adaptation and instrument characteristics.

Authors:  J Alonso; L Prieto; J M Antó
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The impact of diabetic retinopathy on quality of life: qualitative findings from an item bank development project.

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Konrad Pesudovs; Jyoti Khadka; Mohamed Dirani; Gwyn Rees; Tien Y Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.

Authors:  P D Cleary; D T Reilly; S Greenfield; A G Mulley; L Wexler; F Frankel; B J McNeil
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients.

Authors:  Jolie J Gutteling; Jan J V Busschbach; Robert A de Man; Anne-Sophie E Darlington
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.