Literature DB >> 15838408

Use of preventive services by Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries: does spillover from managed care matter?

Siran M Koroukian1, David Litaker, Avi Dor, Gregory S Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care delivery varies with the level of managed care activity (MCA) in an area, potentially affecting health care for those not participating in managed care programs. However, the extent to which MCA is associated with the use of cancer screening by fee-for-service beneficiaries (FFS) is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to study colorectal cancer screening among Medicare FFS beneficiaries in relation to levels of Medicare MCA. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This study linked 1999 Medicare denominator and Part B claims data with the 1998 Area Resource File. After categorizing MCA as low (<10%), moderate (10-29.99%), or high (> or =30%), we assessed the association between colorectal cancer screening among FFS beneficiaries and MCA, controlling for individual demographic variables and county-level attributes of socioeconomic status and physician resources.
SUBJECTS: We included Medicare FFS beneficiaries 65 years of age or older with both Part A and Part B coverage for the entire calendar year from large counties in the study. MEASURES: We measured the likelihood of undergoing fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FLEX), or colonoscopy (COL).
RESULTS: Compared with Medicare FFS beneficiaries residing in counties with low MCA, those in high MCA counties were significantly more likely to undergo FOBT (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.16), FLEX (AOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.18), or colonoscopy, after receiving FOBT/FLEX (AOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13).
CONCLUSIONS: From a public health perspective, an association between higher levels of MCA and colorectal cancer screening among those not enrolled in managed care may translate into modest increases in use of colorectal cancer screening and possibly earlier detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15838408     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160376.42562.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening in the elderly population: disparities by dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment status.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Fang Xu; Avi Dor; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Managed care market share and primary treatment for cancer.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Ellen Meara; Patricia A Ganz; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Ravi K Goyal; Anne-Marie Meyer; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Emily M Gillen; Seth Tyree; Carmen L Lewis; Trisha M Crutchfield; Christa E Martens; Florence Tangka; Lisa C Richardson; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  What Happened to Disparities in CRC Screening Among FFS Medicare Enrollees Following Medicare Modernization?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Mei Zhou; Yamisha Rutherford; Seth Meador; Julia Koschinsky
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-09-19

5.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Spatial Sufficiency of 5% Medicare Standard Analytic Files.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley
Journal:  Spat Demogr       Date:  2015-05-14

7.  Managed care and the diffusion of endoscopy in fee-for-service Medicare.

Authors:  Lee Rivers Mobley; Sujha Subramanian; Julia Koschinsky; H E Frech; Laurel Clayton Trantham; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Health state information derived from secondary databases is affected by multiple sources of bias.

Authors:  Darcey D Terris; David G Litaker; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Factors associated with colon cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Alexandre L Pavluck; Clifford Y Ko; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Pricing of surgeries for colon cancer: patient severity and market factors.

Authors:  Avi Dor; Siran Koroukian; Fang Xu; Jonah Stulberg; Conor Delaney; Gregory Cooper
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.