Literature DB >> 1583607

Discharge patterns of cochlear ganglion neurons in the chicken.

R J Salvi1, S S Saunders, N L Powers, F A Boettcher.   

Abstract

Physiological recordings were made of the compound action potential from the round window and single neurons in the cochlear ganglion of normal adult chickens (Gallus domesticus). The compound action potential threshold to tone bursts decreased from approximately 42 dB at 0.25 kHz to 30 dB between 1 and 2 kHz and then increased to 51 dB at 4 kHz. Most of the cochlear ganglion cells had characteristic frequencies below 2 kHz and the thresholds of most neurons were roughly 30-35 dB lower than the compound action potential thresholds. At any given characteristic frequency, thresholds varied by as much as 60 dB and units with the highest thresholds tended to have the lowest spontaneous rates. Spontaneous discharge rates ranged from 0 to 200 spikes/s with a mean rage of 86 spikes/s. Interspike interval histograms of spontaneous activity often contained regular peaks with the time interval between peaks approximately equal to 1/(characteristic frequency). Tuning curves were sharply tuned and V-shaped with approximately equal slopes to the curves above and below characteristic frequency. Q10dB and Q30dB values for the tuning curves increased with characteristic frequency. Post stimulus time histograms showed sustained firing during the stimulus and were characterized by a slight-to-moderate peak at stimulus onset. Most units showed vigorous phase-locking to tones at characteristic frequency although the degree of phase-locking declined sharply with increasing characteristic frequency. Discharge rate-level functions at characteristic frequency had a mean dynamic range of 42 dB and a mean saturation firing rate of 327 spikes/s. In general, the firing patterns of cochlear ganglion neurons are similar in most respects to those reported in other avians, but differ in several important respects from those seen in mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583607     DOI: 10.1007/bf00196905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  30 in total

1.  Electrical responses from the chicken basilar papilla.

Authors:  R B Patuzzi; C L Bull
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Analysis of spontaneous activity of auditory neurones in the spiral ganglion of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  G A Manley; D Robertson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick.

Authors:  E A McFadden; J C Saunders
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  M E Warchol; P Dallos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Developmental stability of the tonotopic organization of the chick's basilar papilla.

Authors:  G A Manley; J Brix; A Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The development of auditory evoked responses in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of the chick.

Authors:  J C Saunders; R B Coles; G R Gates
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-12-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Development of absolute thresholds in chickens.

Authors:  L Gray; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: an electron-microscopic study of serial sections.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris.

Authors:  E W Rubel; T N Parks
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma.

Authors:  J T Corwin; D A Cotanche
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  23 in total

1.  A role for short-term synaptic facilitation and depression in the processing of intensity information in the auditory brain stem.

Authors:  K M MacLeod; T K Horiuchi; C E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Beyond timing in the auditory brainstem: intensity coding in the avian cochlear nucleus angularis.

Authors:  Katrina M MacLeod; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Phase Locking of Auditory-Nerve Fibers Reveals Stereotyped Distortions and an Exponential Transfer Function with a Level-Dependent Slope.

Authors:  Adam J Peterson; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Minimizing synaptic depression by control of release probability.

Authors:  S Brenowitz; L O Trussell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Short-term synaptic depression is topographically distributed in the cochlear nucleus of the chicken.

Authors:  Stefan N Oline; R Michael Burger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Stefan N Oline; Go Ashida; R Michael Burger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The effects of sound overexposure on the spectral response patterns of nucleus magnocellularis in the neonatal chick.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; J C Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effect of sampling frequency on the measurement of phase-locked action potentials.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.