Literature DB >> 1583054

A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement.

N A Johanson1, M E Charlson, T P Szatrowski, C S Ranawat.   

Abstract

The hip-rating questionnaire was developed for the assessment of the outcome of total hip replacement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness. The questionnaire uses a 100-point scale in which equal weight is given to the domains of global or over-all impact of arthritis, pain, walking, and function. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in the prospective study and have been followed for at least three months; sixty-two patients have been followed for six months; and forty-two patients have been followed for one year. Reproducibility was tested with the use of the kappa statistic in fifty patients whose condition was stable clinically, and it was found to be good or excellent both for individual questions and for the total score. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparison with the scores from a six-minute walking-distance test and arthritis impact-measurement scales. The result of the six-minute walking-distance test correlated with the patient's response concerning walking distance on the hip-rating questionnaire. The score for pain from the hip-rating questionnaire correlated well with the score for pain from the arthritis impact-measurement scales, and the total score from the hip-rating questionnaire correlated well with the total score from the arthritis impact-measurement scales. The score on the hip-rating questionnaire was responsive to the change in the clinical condition of the patient, as indicated by a favorable index of responsiveness. The results of the questionnaire were sensitive enough to demonstrate differences among treatment groups with relatively small sample sizes. This questionnaire has the characteristics of a useful instrument for assessment of outcomes, such as that after an operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  13 in total

1.  A squeaky reputation: the problem may be design-dependent.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Bahar Adeli; Justin C Wong; Camilo Restrepo; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years.

Authors:  Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepistö; Kaj Tallroth; John Elias; Edmund Chao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 3.  A primer on lower extremity outcome measurement instruments.

Authors:  C L Saltzman; C Mueller; K Zwior-Maron; R D Hoffman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1998

4.  Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods.

Authors:  R McMurray; J Heaton; P Sloper; S Nettleton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

5.  Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  Jorge L Perez; Zachary A Mosher; Shawna L Watson; Evan D Sheppard; Eugene W Brabston; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Martyn J Parker; Jonathan A Cook; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  A multi-center trial of exercise and testosterone therapy in women after hip fracture: Design, methods and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ellen F Binder; Jesse C Christensen; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Jenna Bartley; Sarah D Berry; Adrian S Dobs; Richard H Fortinsky; Kerry L Hildreth; Douglas P Kiel; George A Kuchel; Robin L Marcus; Christine M McDonough; Denise Orwig; David R Sinacore; Robert S Schwartz; Elena Volpi; Jay Magaziner; Kenneth B Schechtman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.261

8.  Can shared care deliver better outcomes for patients undergoing total hip replacement? A prospective assessment of patient outcomes and associated service use.

Authors:  H Rosendal; W T van Beekum; P Nijhof; L P de Witte; A J Schrijvers
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Three-dimensional mechanical evaluation of joint contact pressure in 12 periacetabular osteotomy patients with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert S Armiger; Mehran Armand; Kaj Tallroth; Jyri Lepistö; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Clinical evaluation of a biomechanical guidance system for periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Ryan J Murphy; Robert S Armiger; Jyri Lepistö; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.