BACKGROUND: Deficiencies in folate and vitamin B12 have been associated with neurodegenerative disease. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between rates of age-related cognitive change and dietary intakes of folate and vitamin B12. DESIGN: Prospective study performed from 1993 to 2002. SETTING: Geographically defined biracial community in Chicago, Ill. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3718 residents, 65 years and older, who completed 2 to 3 cognitive assessments and a food frequency questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in cognitive function measured at baseline and 3-year and 6-year follow-ups, using the average z score of 4 tests: the East Boston Tests of immediate and delayed recall, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. RESULTS: High folate intake was associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline in mixed models adjusted for multiple risk factors. The rate of cognitive decline among persons in the top fifth of total folate intake (median, 742 microg/d) was more than twice that of those in the lowest fifth of intake (median, 186 microg/d), a statistically significant difference of 0.02 standardized unit per year (P = .002). A faster rate of cognitive decline was also associated with high folate intake from food (P for trend = .04) and with folate vitamin supplementation of more than 400 microg/d compared with nonusers (beta = -.03, P<.001). High total B12 intake was associated with slower cognitive decline only among the oldest participants. CONCLUSIONS: High intake of folate may be associated with cognitive decline in older persons. These unexpected findings call for further study of the cognitive implications of high levels of dietary folate in older populations.
BACKGROUND: Deficiencies in folate and vitamin B12 have been associated with neurodegenerative disease. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between rates of age-related cognitive change and dietary intakes of folate and vitamin B12. DESIGN: Prospective study performed from 1993 to 2002. SETTING: Geographically defined biracial community in Chicago, Ill. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3718 residents, 65 years and older, who completed 2 to 3 cognitive assessments and a food frequency questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in cognitive function measured at baseline and 3-year and 6-year follow-ups, using the average z score of 4 tests: the East Boston Tests of immediate and delayed recall, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. RESULTS: High folate intake was associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline in mixed models adjusted for multiple risk factors. The rate of cognitive decline among persons in the top fifth of total folate intake (median, 742 microg/d) was more than twice that of those in the lowest fifth of intake (median, 186 microg/d), a statistically significant difference of 0.02 standardized unit per year (P = .002). A faster rate of cognitive decline was also associated with high folate intake from food (P for trend = .04) and with folate vitamin supplementation of more than 400 microg/d compared with nonusers (beta = -.03, P<.001). High total B12 intake was associated with slower cognitive decline only among the oldest participants. CONCLUSIONS: High intake of folate may be associated with cognitive decline in older persons. These unexpected findings call for further study of the cognitive implications of high levels of dietary folate in older populations.
Authors: Hiroko H Dodge; Yuriko Katsumata; Hidemi Todoriki; Shoutoku Yasura; D Craig Willcox; Gene L Bowman; Bradley Willcox; Scott Leonard; Aaron Clemons; Barry S Oken; Jeffrey A Kaye; Maret G Traber Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lindsay H Allen; Joshua W Miller; Lisette de Groot; Irwin H Rosenberg; A David Smith; Helga Refsum; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Dan M Mungas; Sebastien Haneuse; Eric B Larson; Lewis Kuller; Kathleen Hall; Gerald van Belle Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 6.437