Literature DB >> 15823468

Strain rate influences periosteal adaptation in mature bone.

Jeremy M LaMothe1, Nicolas H Hamilton, Ronald F Zernicke.   

Abstract

Mechanical forces influence bone form and function. Although the adaptive capabilities of bone are well known, the nuances of the mechanical stimuli regulating adaptation remain elusive. Recently, it was suggested that strain rate influences bone adaptation, and impact exercises with high strain rates during growth may be more osteogenic than low impact aerobic exercises. Building on those findings, we hypothesized that higher rates of mechanical loading would evoke greater adaptive responses than lower rates of loading in mature bone. To test that hypothesis, skeletally mature (16 weeks) female C57BL/6 mice underwent non-invasive exogenous cantilever bending of the right tibia with a 1 Hz trapezoidal waveform for 60 s, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. Loading was calibrated (strain gauge) to induce peak magnitudes of 1000 microepsilon on the lateral tibial middiaphysis. Mice were randomly assigned to three groups based on strain rate of the applied load: low (0.004 s(-1); n = 14), medium (0.020 s(-1); n = 15), and high (0.100 s(-1); n = 14). Calcein injections (i.p., 10 mg kg(-1)) permitted histomorphometric analyses of bone formation. Loading significantly enhanced periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR), mineralizing surface (MS), and bone formation rate (BFR BS(-1)) in all three strain rate groups, relative to control tibiae. Furthermore, a graded dose-response relation was observed between the applied strain rate and periosteal BFR BS(-1). These increases in MAR, MS, and BFR BS(-1) were not seen on the endosteal surface. Endosteal adaptation was not statistically different between loaded and control tibiae in most endosteal indices of bone adaptation. Moreover, endosteal adaptation did not increase with strain rate. Understanding the nature of the stimuli to which bone cells respond to may underpin the development of non-pharmacological treatments devised to enhance bone mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15823468     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  28 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of the effect of controlled high- and low-frequency mechanical loading on peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Katleen Vandamme; Antonia Torcasio; Toru Ogawa; G Harry van Lenthe; Ignace Naert; Joke Duyck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Magnetic forces and magnetized biomaterials provide dynamic flux information during bone regeneration.

Authors:  Alessandro Russo; Michele Bianchi; Maria Sartori; Annapaola Parrilli; Silvia Panseri; Alessandro Ortolani; Monica Sandri; Marco Boi; Donald M Salter; Maria Cristina Maltarello; Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Valentin Dediu; Anna Tampieri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Periosteal thickness and cellularity in mid-diaphyseal cross-sections from human femora and tibiae of aged donors.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke; John Truscott
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Functional disuse initiates medullary endosteal micro-architectural impairment in cortical bone characterized by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Kartikey Grover; Minyi Hu; Liangjun Lin; Jesse Muir; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Knee loading stimulates healing of mouse bone wounds in a femur neck.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Tibial compression is anabolic in the adult mouse skeleton despite reduced responsiveness with aging.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Russell P Main; Qian Xu; Thomas L Schmicker; Mitchell B Schaffler; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Effects of artificial gravity during bed rest on bone metabolism in humans.

Authors:  S M Smith; S R Zwart; M A Heer; N Baecker; H J Evans; A H Feiveson; L C Shackelford; A D Leblanc
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-12

9.  Joint loading-driven bone formation and signaling pathways predicted from genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Constrained tibial vibration does not produce an anabolic bone response in adult mice.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen; Akhilesh A Kotiya; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.