Literature DB >> 15821925

Low-dose ionizing radiation: induction of differential intracellular signalling possibly affecting intercellular communication.

James E Trosko1, Chia-Cheng Chang, Brad L Upham, Mei-Hui Tai.   

Abstract

Given the complexity of the carcinogenic process and the lack of any mechanistic understanding of how ionizing radiation at low-level exposures affects the multistage, multimechanism processes of carcinogenesis, it is imperative that concepts and paradigms be reexamined when extrapolating from high dose to low dose. Any health effect directly linked to low-dose radiation exposure must have molecular/biochemical and biological bases. On the other hand, demonstrating some molecular/biochemical or cellular effect, using surrogate systems for the human being, does not necessarily imply a corresponding health effect. Given the general acceptance of an extrapolated LNT model, our current understanding of carcinogenesis cries out for a resolution of a real problem. How can a low-level acute, or even a chronic, exposure of ionizing radiation bring about all the different mechanisms (mutagenic, cytotoxic, and epigenetic) and genotypic/phenotypic changes needed to convert normal cells to an invasive, malignant cell, given all the protective, repair, and suppressive systems known to exist in the human body? Until recently, the prevailing paradigm that ionizing radiation brings about cancer primarily by DNA damage and its conversion to gene and chromosomal mutations, drove our interpretation of radiation carcinogenesis. Today, our knowledge includes the facts both that epigenetic events play a major role in carcinogenesis and that low-dose radiation can also induce epigenetic events in and between cells in tissues. This challenges any simple extrapolation of the LNT model. Although a recent delineation of "hallmarks" of the cancer process has helped to focus on how ionizing radiation might contribute to the induction of cancers, several other hallmarks, previously ignored--namely, the stem cells in tissues as targets for carcinogenesis and the role of cell-cell communication processes in modulating the radiation effects on the target cell--must be considered, particularly for the adaptive response, bystander effects, and genomic instability phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821925     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-005-0269-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  52 in total

1.  Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  William M Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stem cells of the corneal epithelium lack connexins and metabolite transfer capacity.

Authors:  M Matic; I N Petrov; S Chen; C Wang; S D Dimitrijevich; J M Wolosin
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.880

3.  Two types of normal human breast epithelial cells derived from reduction mammoplasty: phenotypic characterization and response to SV40 transfection.

Authors:  C Y Kao; K Nomata; C S Oakley; C W Welsch; C C Chang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  W F Morgan; J P Day; M I Kaplan; E M McGhee; C L Limoli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Commentary: is the concept of "tumor promotion" a useful paradigm?

Authors:  J E Trosko
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.784

6.  Stem cells in differentiation and neoplasia.

Authors:  J E Till
Journal:  J Cell Physiol Suppl       Date:  1982

7.  Elimination of metabolic cooperation in Chinese hamster cells by a tumor promoter.

Authors:  L P Yotti; C C Chang; J E Trosko
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Toxicant-induced oxidative stress in cancer.

Authors:  B L Upham; J G Wagner
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Role of gap junctional intercellular communication in radiation-induced bystander effects in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Mizuho Aoki; Koichi Ando
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Phenotypic diversity in experimental hepatomas: the concept of partially blocked ontogeny. The 10th Walter Hubert Lecture.

Authors:  V R Potter
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Low-radiation environment affects the development of protection mechanisms in V79 cells.

Authors:  E Fratini; C Carbone; D Capece; G Esposito; G Simone; M A Tabocchini; M Tomasi; M Belli; L Satta
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Galactic cosmic ray simulation at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory.

Authors:  John W Norbury; Walter Schimmerling; Tony C Slaba; Edouard I Azzam; Francis F Badavi; Giorgio Baiocco; Eric Benton; Veronica Bindi; Eleanor A Blakely; Steve R Blattnig; David A Boothman; Thomas B Borak; Richard A Britten; Stan Curtis; Michael Dingfelder; Marco Durante; William S Dynan; Amelia J Eisch; S Robin Elgart; Dudley T Goodhead; Peter M Guida; Lawrence H Heilbronn; Christine E Hellweg; Janice L Huff; Amy Kronenberg; Chiara La Tessa; Derek I Lowenstein; Jack Miller; Takashi Morita; Livio Narici; Gregory A Nelson; Ryan B Norman; Andrea Ottolenghi; Zarana S Patel; Guenther Reitz; Adam Rusek; Ann-Sofie Schreurs; Lisa A Scott-Carnell; Edward Semones; Jerry W Shay; Vyacheslav A Shurshakov; Lembit Sihver; Lisa C Simonsen; Michael D Story; Mitchell S Turker; Yukio Uchihori; Jacqueline Williams; Cary J Zeitlin
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-02-17

4.  Lung cancer mortality (1950-1999) among Eldorado uranium workers: a comparison of models of carcinogenesis and empirical excess risk models.

Authors:  Markus Eidemüller; Peter Jacob; Rachel S D Lane; Stanley E Frost; Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Beyond two-stage models for lung carcinogenesis in the Mayak workers: implications for plutonium risk.

Authors:  Sascha Zöllner; Mikhail E Sokolnikov; Markus Eidemüller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Radiation for Awakening the Dormant Immune System, a Promising Challenge to be Explored.

Authors:  Luis de la Cruz-Merino; Ana Illescas-Vacas; Ana Grueso-López; Antonio Barco-Sánchez; Carlos Míguez-Sánchez
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 7.561

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.