Literature DB >> 15821861

Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach.

M E Fenoglio1, H R Bermas, W E Haun, J T Moore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgical approaches to the repair of inguinal hernias have shown the advantages of placing mesh in the preperitoneal space. Despite those advantages, laparoscopic hernia repairs have been associated with increased cost, longer operating times, and advanced laparoscopic skills. An open preperitoneal approach has the benefit of mesh in the preperitoneal position without the disadvantages of a laparoscopic procedure.
METHODS: We present our experience with the use of an open preperitoneal mesh repair (KugelMesh, Bard, Inc.). The study was conducted in a prospective fashion from January 1998 through October 2001. 1072 hernias were repaired in two community hospitals by three general surgeons. Patients with recurrent hernias were excluded if the initial repair was from a preperitoneal approach. Operative time, cost, post-operative pain, and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Recurrences occurred in five patients (0.47%) during a mean follow-up time of 23 months (range: 2-47). The average operating time was 32.4 min (range: 16-62). Post-operative narcotic pain medication usage averaged 5.8 pills (range: 0-26) per repair. Average surgical charges were less for the open preperitoneal approach ($2253) than for laparoscopic repairs ($4826).
CONCLUSIONS: The open preperitoneal hernia repair using the Kugel mesh offers many advantages. It is inexpensive, has a low recurrence rate, and allows the surgeon to cover all potential defects with one piece of mesh. Postoperative recovery is short and postoperative pain is minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821861     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0313-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  9 in total

1.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic vs conventional inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  R S Chung; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Exploiting vs avoiding the preperitoneal space in inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Parviz K Amid
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02

3.  Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).

Authors:  B Johansson; B Hallerbäck; H Glise; B Anesten; S Smedberg; J Román
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P Juul; K Christensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  R D Kugel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Improved functional outcome and more rapid return to normal activity following laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  M T Savarise; J P Simpson; J M Moore; V M Leis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data [corrected].

Authors:  A M Grant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair.

Authors:  Donn M Schroder; Larry R Lloyd; John E Boccaccio; Cheryl A Wesen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Surgical outcome and hospital cost analyses of laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair.

Authors:  E A Papachristou; M F Mitselou; N D Finokaliotis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.739

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Open, preperitoneal hernia repair with the Kugel patch: a prospective, multicentre study of 450 repairs.

Authors:  Y Van Nieuwenhove; F Vansteenkiste; T Vierendeels; K Coenye
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Is there a risk of infertility after inguinal mesh repair? Experimental studies in the pig and the rabbit.

Authors:  Christian Peiper; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Eva Strehlau; A Ottinger; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Minimally invasive preperitoneal single-layer mesh repair versus standard Lichtenstein hernia repair for inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K Arslan; B Erenoglu; E Turan; H Koksal; O Dogru
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Tumescent local anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  Ju Won Chyung; Dong Gue Shin; Yujin Kwon; Dong Hui Cho; Kyung Bok Lee; Sang Soo Park; Jin Yoon; Yong Seog Jang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Omer Bender; Fatih Levent Balcı; Enis Yüney; Fazıl Sağlam; Yaşar Ozdenkaya; Yavuz Selim Sarı
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon Nienhuijs; Erik Staal; Mariël Keemers-Gels; Camiel Rosman; Luc Strobbe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A 12-year experience of using the Kugel procedure for adult inguinal hernias via the internal ring approach.

Authors:  R Lin; X Lin; F Lu; H Fang; Y Yang; C Wang; Y Chen; H Huang
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Colovesical fistula following an open preperitoneal "Kugel" mesh repair of an inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S G Barreto; D Schoemaker; M Siddins; D Wattchow
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Inguinal hernias in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: is tension-free mesh repair feasible?

Authors:  Qiyu Chi; Zheng Shi; Zhibo Zhang; Chunzhong Lin; Guozhong Liu; Shangeng Weng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.